Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ENT-11094: Improved rpm verification for hub package #1345

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jan 9, 2024

Conversation

nickanderson
Copy link
Member

@nickanderson nickanderson commented Dec 12, 2023

@nickanderson
Copy link
Member Author

@cf-bottom jenkins, please.

@cf-bottom
Copy link

Copy link
Contributor

@vpodzime vpodzime left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

it's its in the last commit message. Otherwise this looks good to me. I didn't even know %verify was a thing. Very nice!

…nt hash

As a log file it's expected to change and be rotated, so rpm verification should
not target content hash or file time.

Ticket: ENT-11094
Changelog: Title
Ticket: ENT-11094
Changelog: Title
runalerts.php is rendered by policy, as such its content and file time are
expected to change. This modification excludes file time and md5 content from
RPM verification.

Ticket: ENT-11094
Changelog: Title
@nickanderson
Copy link
Member Author

@cf-bottom jenkins, please.

@cf-bottom
Copy link

vpodzime
vpodzime previously approved these changes Dec 18, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@vpodzime vpodzime left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ACK. Thanks! 👏

craigcomstock
craigcomstock previously approved these changes Dec 18, 2023
@nickanderson
Copy link
Member Author

@cf-bottom jenkins, please.

@cf-bottom
Copy link

@nickanderson
Copy link
Member Author

Last build was green. Shall we merge to master?

@nickanderson nickanderson merged commit d6d04a9 into cfengine:master Jan 9, 2024
36 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants