Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Replacing RadClass.RadClass with RadClass.Processor #39

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 20, 2022

Conversation

stompsjo
Copy link
Collaborator

With #38, the workflow of RadClass will slightly change. RadClass.RadClass will now be seen predominantly as a data processing unit. While it does have functionality to conduct analysis iteratively as it processes data (see AnalysisParameters, or RadClass.H0), the new SSML models will be used separately, after data processing occurs, acting upon the fully processed dataset.

Since RadClass.RadClass's scope has changed, I am renaming it to reflect its role: RadClass.Processor. Now, the output of the processor (i.e. processed data, or spectra) will be given to ML models as a post-processing step by the user.

@stompsjo stompsjo requested a review from gonuke September 26, 2022 15:12
@stompsjo stompsjo self-assigned this Sep 26, 2022
@stompsjo
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@gonuke This PR is rebased and now ready for merge.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Oct 31, 2022

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 3363446292

  • 1 of 1 (100.0%) changed or added relevant line in 1 file are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 100.0%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 3348444582: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 221
Relevant Lines: 221

💛 - Coveralls

Copy link
Member

@gonuke gonuke left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is pretty straightforward and clean. Sorry it took me so long to review.

@gonuke gonuke merged commit ee05b92 into cnerg:main Nov 20, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants