Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: add dynamic file structures in loop using yield-tag #1855

Open
wants to merge 14 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

kj-9
Copy link

@kj-9 kj-9 commented Nov 10, 2024

What I did:

  • Added a new Jinja extension in copier/jinja_ext.py to handle yield tags
    • This is a lightweight extension that detects yield tags and sets up the necessary context through jinja_env
  • Updated _render_path to return multiple destination paths and their corresponding contexts when yield tags are present
    • Internally, delegated the recursive logic for generating paths and contexts from yield tags to the _render_parts function
  • Added extra_context parameter to _render_file to enable injection of contexts generated from yield tags

kj-9 added 2 commits November 10, 2024 12:21
… extention for yield tag, allow _render_path to generate mulitple paths and contexts when yield tag is used
… test file to test dynamic file structure feature
@kj-9
Copy link
Author

kj-9 commented Nov 10, 2024

hopefully closes #1271

Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 10, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 97.74%. Comparing base (8391966) to head (6f4acec).
Report is 10 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1855      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   97.67%   97.74%   +0.07%     
==========================================
  Files          49       51       +2     
  Lines        5238     5358     +120     
==========================================
+ Hits         5116     5237     +121     
+ Misses        122      121       -1     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 97.74% <100.00%> (+0.07%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.


🚨 Try these New Features:

@sisp sisp self-requested a review November 12, 2024 20:56
@yajo
Copy link
Member

yajo commented Nov 20, 2024

I only reviewed tests in depth so far, and it seems the interface is almost exactly what I meant! Awesome!

Quoting from #1271 (comment):

are you rendering a filename?
No: just let the exception raise and print a nice message "Using yield outside of file names isn't supported".

That seems to be the only missing part. At least I saw no test for that. Could you add this please?

When done I'll review the implementation. This PR is big!

Thank you very much 😊

…d YieldTagInFileError and raise it if yield tag used when rendering file content. also add the test case
@kj-9
Copy link
Author

kj-9 commented Nov 22, 2024

@yajo

Thank you for your review!

I've added a new commit that implements the behavior you mentioned - throwing an exception when yield is used for rendering file contents. I've also added the corresponding test case.

Looking forward to your implementation review!

copier/errors.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Member

@yajo yajo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Finally, the first code review is here!

Apart from what's mentioned, I also miss the documentation.

Thank you!

copier/jinja_ext.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
copier/jinja_ext.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
copier/jinja_ext.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
copier/jinja_ext.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
copier/jinja_ext.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
copier/jinja_ext.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
copier/jinja_ext.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
copier/jinja_ext.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
copier/main.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
copier/main.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
kj-9 added 4 commits December 1, 2024 13:10
…ntext with yield_name and yield_iterable attributes in YieldEnvironment and YieldExtension
…or check to _render_file method to enforce yield tag restrictions during file rendering
…r of parameters in _yield_support method for consistency and clarity
…ng over lists to generate files and directories
@kj-9
Copy link
Author

kj-9 commented Dec 2, 2024

@yajo
Thank you for the quick review!

I have added a few commits:

  • Fixes according to your comments
  • Minor code refactoring

And in the last commit, I added documentation. Specifically, three points:

  1. Added a row for the new feature in the comparison table (as far as I know, only copier supports this feature)
  2. Added jinja_ext.py to the Reference
  3. Added a section explaining the new feature to Configuring.

This is my first time adding documentation, so I'm not sure if it meets your expectations.
Could you please review it again?

@kj-9 kj-9 requested a review from yajo December 3, 2024 06:19
Copy link
Member

@yajo yajo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Implementation looks very good, thanks!

Please review a couple of suggestions for the docs, so we can merge.

@copier-org/maintainers this is an important feature, would you like to add your reviews?

docs/configuring.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/configuring.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@sisp
Copy link
Member

sisp commented Dec 30, 2024

I'll try to give feedback later today.

Copy link
Contributor

@pawamoy pawamoy left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

A few suggestions, nothing critical, looking good 🙂

copier/jinja_ext.py Show resolved Hide resolved
copier/jinja_ext.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
copier/jinja_ext.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
copier/jinja_ext.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
copier/jinja_ext.py Show resolved Hide resolved
copier/main.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
copier/main.py Show resolved Hide resolved
copier/main.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Member

@sisp sisp left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for working on this long-awaited feature, @kj-9! 🙏 I have a few conceptual remarks. WDYT, @kj-9 and @copier-org/maintainers?

copier/jinja_ext.py Show resolved Hide resolved
copier/jinja_ext.py Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Member

@yajo yajo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This mostly LGTM, just a couple of minor comments. Thanks!


!!! example

```pycon
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
```pycon
```python

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@yajo
see @pawamoy 's comment #1855 (comment)

in my dev env, syntax highlighting on console results are bit different based on pycon or python

if set pycon
スクリーンショット 2025-01-08 0 32 09

if set python
スクリーンショット 2025-01-08 0 32 23

I'm not sure which is suitable here.

environment: YieldEnvironment

def __init__(self, environment: YieldEnvironment):
super().__init__(environment)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thought: It seems to me like this method override is doing nothing, right? Could you remove these lines?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@yajo
your right, done in 5f11c99

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants