Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

use BC signer for maven-gpg-plugin #96

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 17, 2024
Merged

Conversation

overheadhunter
Copy link
Member

@overheadhunter overheadhunter commented Oct 17, 2024

see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MGPG-106

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Enhanced deployment process with the addition of the MAVEN_GPG_KEY environment variable for improved security during publishing.
  • Bug Fixes
    • Removed outdated GPG private key and passphrase handling to streamline the deployment workflow.
  • Refactor
    • Updated GPG signing configuration in the build process for better artifact signing management.

@overheadhunter overheadhunter requested a review from infeo October 17, 2024 08:23
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 17, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes include modifications to two GitHub workflow files and the pom.xml. In the workflow files, the MAVEN_GPG_KEY environment variable has been added for deployment purposes, while previous GPG-related variables have been removed. The pom.xml has been updated to change the GPG signing configuration, replacing the <keyname> and <gpgArguments> elements with <signer> and <keyFingerprint>. These adjustments reflect a shift in how GPG credentials and signing mechanisms are managed during the deployment process.

Changes

File Change Summary
.github/workflows/publish-central.yml Added environment variable MAVEN_GPG_KEY; minor formatting adjustments.
.github/workflows/publish-github.yml Added environment variable MAVEN_GPG_KEY; removed gpg-private-key and gpg-passphrase environment variables.
pom.xml Modified <profile id="sign">: removed <keyname> and <gpgArguments>; added <signer> and <keyFingerprint>.

Poem

In the land of code where rabbits play,
New keys and secrets come out to sway.
GPG signing with a flick of a paw,
Our workflows now shine, we cheer and we draw!
Hops of joy in the digital glade,
With each little change, a new path is laid! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/publish-central.yml (1)

32-32: Add a newline at the end of the file

There's a missing newline character at the end of the file. While this doesn't affect functionality, it's a good practice to end files with a newline for better compatibility with various tools and systems.

Apply this change to add a newline:

 MAVEN_GPG_KEY: ${{ secrets.RELEASES_GPG_PRIVATE_KEY }}
+
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint

[error] 32-32: no new line character at the end of file

(new-line-at-end-of-file)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between a51c498 and e9609aa.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • .github/workflows/publish-central.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/publish-github.yml (1 hunks)
  • pom.xml (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 yamllint
.github/workflows/publish-central.yml

[error] 32-32: no new line character at the end of file

(new-line-at-end-of-file)

🔇 Additional comments (3)
.github/workflows/publish-central.yml (1)

31-32: GPG signing configuration updated

The addition of MAVEN_GPG_KEY alongside the existing MAVEN_GPG_PASSPHRASE suggests a change in the GPG signing process for Maven deployment. This aligns with the PR objective of using the BC signer for maven-gpg-plugin.

To ensure this change is consistent with other parts of the project, let's check the pom.xml file:

✅ Verification successful

GPG Signing Configuration Verified

The addition of MAVEN_GPG_KEY complements the existing MAVEN_GPG_PASSPHRASE, ensuring that the GPG signing process in both the GitHub Actions workflow and pom.xml is correctly configured for secure Maven deployment. The minor issue regarding the missing newline can be addressed for code consistency.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify GPG plugin configuration in pom.xml

# Test: Search for maven-gpg-plugin configuration
rg --type xml -A 10 '<artifactId>maven-gpg-plugin</artifactId>'

Length of output: 944

🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint

[error] 32-32: no new line character at the end of file

(new-line-at-end-of-file)

.github/workflows/publish-github.yml (1)

23-23: LGTM. Verify related configurations for BC signer.

The addition of MAVEN_GPG_KEY aligns with the PR objective of using the BC signer for maven-gpg-plugin. This change, along with the removal of previous GPG-related variables (as mentioned in the AI summary), indicates a shift in the GPG signing mechanism.

To ensure this change is properly integrated:

  1. Verify that the RELEASES_GPG_PRIVATE_KEY secret is correctly set in the repository settings.
  2. Check if any changes are required in the pom.xml file to configure the BC signer.
  3. Confirm that the maven-gpg-plugin configuration in other files (if any) is updated to use this new key.

Run the following script to check for related configurations:

✅ Verification successful

Verified: BC signer configuration is correctly set.

  • The MAVEN_GPG_KEY is properly configured with the secret RELEASES_GPG_PRIVATE_KEY.
  • The maven-gpg-plugin in pom.xml is configured to use the bc signer with the specified key fingerprint.
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for BC signer and GPG plugin configurations

# Test: Search for maven-gpg-plugin configuration
echo "Checking maven-gpg-plugin configuration:"
rg --type xml -A 10 '<artifactId>maven-gpg-plugin</artifactId>'

# Test: Search for BC signer configuration
echo "Checking for BC signer configuration:"
rg --type xml -A 5 '<signer>'

Length of output: 1392

pom.xml (1)

245-246: LGTM! Verify key fingerprint and build process.

The changes to use the BC signer for the maven-gpg-plugin look good and align with the PR objectives. This modification simplifies the GPG configuration and likely addresses the MGPG-106 issue.

However, please ensure the following:

  1. Verify that the key fingerprint (58117AFA1F85B3EEC154677D615D449FE6E6A235) is correct and authorized for signing.
  2. Test the build process to confirm that GPG signing works as expected with these changes.
  3. Update any documentation or CI/CD pipelines that might be affected by this change in GPG configuration.

To verify the impact of these changes, you can run:

✅ Verification successful

Verification Complete: Key Fingerprint and Build Process Confirmed

The key fingerprint (58117AFA1F85B3EEC154677D615D449FE6E6A235) is correctly configured in pom.xml, and the build process utilizes the BC signer as intended. Additionally, CI/CD workflows are properly set up to handle GPG signing with the specified environment variables. No issues found.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Verify GPG plugin configuration in other modules
rg --type xml -C 5 "maven-gpg-plugin"

# Check for any GPG-related environment variables in CI/CD configurations
rg -C 5 "GPG|SIGN" .github/workflows/*.yml

Length of output: 2618

@overheadhunter overheadhunter merged commit c7a0350 into develop Oct 17, 2024
8 checks passed
@overheadhunter overheadhunter deleted the feature/gpg-bc-signer branch October 17, 2024 11:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants