Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

update to macos-latest runner #97

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 17, 2024
Merged

Conversation

overheadhunter
Copy link
Member

@overheadhunter overheadhunter commented Oct 17, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated the GitHub Actions workflow to run on the latest macOS version.
    • Standardized artifact naming for coverage reports across platforms.
    • Improved job dependencies for SonarCloud analysis and release processes.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 17, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in the pull request modify the GitHub Actions workflow located in .github/workflows/build.yml. Key updates include changing the macOS version for the mac job to macos-latest, clarifying the installation commands for FUSE, standardizing artifact names for coverage reports, restructuring the sonarcloud job to depend on the completion of other jobs, and conditioning the release job to trigger only on tagged commits.

Changes

File Change Summary
.github/workflows/build.yml - Updated mac job to run on macos-latest.
- Clarified installation commands for FUSE.
- Standardized artifact names for coverage reports.
- Restructured sonarcloud job dependencies.
- Conditioned release job to trigger on tagged commits.

Poem

🐇 In the land of code where rabbits play,
The workflows dance in a streamlined way.
With macOS latest, they hop along,
Standardized names, they sing a song.
Tags bring the joy of releases anew,
In the burrow of builds, all's bright and true! 🌟


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/build.yml (1)

Line range hint 1-138: Suggestion: Further workflow enhancements

While the current changes improve the workflow, consider the following additional enhancements:

  1. Use composite actions: Create reusable composite actions for common steps like setting up Java and FUSE. This can reduce duplication across jobs.

  2. Utilize matrix strategy: Implement a matrix strategy for testing across different Java versions or OS versions to increase test coverage.

  3. Caching improvements: Extend caching to cover more dependencies, potentially including FUSE-related files.

  4. Update deprecated action: The actions/create-release@v1 action used in the release job is deprecated. Consider updating to softprops/action-gh-release@v1 or using the GitHub CLI for creating releases.

Would you like assistance in implementing any of these suggestions?

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between a51c498 and e1286f5.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/build.yml (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/workflows/build.yml (1)

34-34: Approved: Update to macos-latest runner

Updating to macos-latest ensures that the job always runs on the most recent stable macOS version available on GitHub Actions. This change helps keep the build environment up-to-date without requiring manual updates to the workflow file.

To ensure compatibility, please verify that all steps in the mac job complete successfully with this change. Run the following script to check recent workflow runs:

This will help confirm that the workflow is still functioning as expected with the new runner version.

✅ Verification successful

Please run the following script to retrieve all recent workflow runs for build.yml:


Verified: macos-latest runner is functioning correctly

Recent workflow runs for build.yml using the macos-latest runner have completed successfully across multiple branches. This confirms that the update does not introduce any issues.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check recent workflow runs for the `mac` job

# Get the 5 most recent workflow runs
gh run list --limit 5 --workflow build.yml --json conclusion,createdAt,headBranch | jq '.[] | select(.headBranch == "main") | {conclusion, createdAt}'

Length of output: 152


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Retrieve all recent workflow runs for `build.yml`

gh run list --workflow build.yml --limit 10 --json status,conclusion,headBranch,createdAt | jq '.[] | {status, conclusion, headBranch, createdAt}'

Length of output: 1584

@overheadhunter overheadhunter merged commit 6e32318 into develop Oct 17, 2024
8 checks passed
@overheadhunter overheadhunter deleted the feature/ci-macos-latest branch October 17, 2024 11:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant