Add support for fault sets to modules.

[ctronco]

Description

• Adds fault_set_id|fault_set_name as a a parameter to dellemc.powerflex.sds
• Add fault_set module dellemc.powerflex.fault_set
• Add fault_set as a parameter to dellemc.powerflex.info

GitHub Issues

N/A

Checklist:

• I have performed a self-review of my own code to ensure there are no formatting, pep8, linting, or security issues
• I have performed Ansible Sanity test using --docker default
• I have verified that new and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
• I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
• I have made corresponding changes to the documentation

How Has This Been Tested?

Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Please also list any relevant details for your test configuration
This code was is a backport of code that's been in use by my team, but this code was tested in a lab environment.

• Add Fault zone
• Remove fault zone
• Tested adding an sds with fault set specified

[Bhavneet-Sharma]

Remove the ansible_powerflex.log file.

Add the example fault_set.yml in _playbooks/modules/

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 92.77899% with 66 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (main@7d9eeda). Click here to learn what that means.

Files	Patch %	Lines
...dule_utils/storage/dell/libraries/configuration.py	58.00%	18 Missing and 3 partials ⚠️
plugins/modules/sds.py	91.17%	5 Missing and 13 partials ⚠️
plugins/modules/info.py	68.75%	6 Missing and 4 partials ⚠️
plugins/modules/fault_set.py	92.92%	4 Missing and 4 partials ⚠️
...gins/module_utils/libraries/powerflex_unit_base.py	84.00%	2 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️
...ule_utils/storage/dell/libraries/powerflex_base.py	82.35%	3 Missing ⚠️
...s/unit/plugins/module_utils/libraries/fail_json.py	80.00%	1 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main      #38   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage        ?   82.80%           
=======================================
  Files           ?       46           
  Lines           ?     5855           
  Branches        ?      791           
=======================================
  Hits            ?     4848           
  Misses          ?      742           
  Partials        ?      265           

Flag	Coverage Δ
units	82.80% <92.77%> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.