Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[CT-667] multi az aurora serverless v2 w/ 2 read replica instances #46

Closed
wants to merge 7 commits into from

Conversation

dydxwill
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@dydxwill dydxwill changed the title multi az rds w/ 2 read replicas [IND-355] multi az rds w/ 2 read replicas Oct 25, 2023
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
locals {
db_engine = "postgres"
db_engine = "aurora-postgresql"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Note: I would've liked to use aurora at the start, but wondering do we need to do a migration of data for this change / would this be apply-able to a currently running postgres instance + read-replica without destroying anything / losing data?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not sure. I think we'd need to do data migration ourselves. I haven't tested this code fully in dev3.
I'm prioritizing deleveraging now, and unassigned myself from the linear ticket.
Feel free to take this on if you have time.

@dydxwill dydxwill closed this Dec 7, 2023
@dydxwill dydxwill reopened this Mar 6, 2024
@dydxwill dydxwill changed the title [IND-355] multi az rds w/ 2 read replicas [CT-667] multi az rds w/ 2 read replicas Mar 6, 2024
Copy link

linear bot commented Mar 6, 2024

@dydxwill dydxwill changed the title [CT-667] multi az rds w/ 2 read replicas [CT-667] multi az aurora serverless v2 w/ 2 read replica instances Mar 7, 2024
@dydxwill dydxwill closed this Mar 11, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants