Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Move also edge bendpoints of nested nodes when parent is moved #442

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 6, 2024

Conversation

jbicker
Copy link
Contributor

@jbicker jbicker commented Mar 1, 2024

Fixes #428

The classdiagram example has been changed as well in order to demonstrate this case better.

…so taken into account

Fixes Moving multiple containers does not show feedback move of internal edge bendpoints #428

Signed-off-by: Jan Bicker <[email protected]>
@jbicker jbicker requested review from spoenemann and gfontorbe March 1, 2024 10:37
Copy link
Contributor

@gfontorbe gfontorbe left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Tested locally and works as expected

@jbicker jbicker merged commit 31b428b into master Mar 6, 2024
2 checks passed
@jbicker jbicker deleted the jbicker/moving-multiple-containers-428 branch March 6, 2024 08:20
packages/sprotty/src/features/move/move.ts Show resolved Hide resolved
packages/sprotty/src/features/move/move.ts Show resolved Hide resolved
}
});
};
const handleEdgesForChildren = (el: SModelElementImpl) => {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we really need to move all edges for children? If an edge is contained in the element, its coordinates are usually relative to that element, so we don't need to change them when the element is moved.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes. They need to be put into attachedEdgeShifts because otherwise they aren't handled here and the routing points stay where they are.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

But what happens if package A contains nodes B and C, and those two nodes are connected by an edge which is also a child of A? Could you try that case? What we need to avoid is moving routing points for elements that are relative to a moved container.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I tried that case. I changed the class diagram because of that case. Before the routing points of such an edge didn't move at all with the parent but stay at their absolute position.

jbicker added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 7, 2024
this is a followup for #442
@spoenemann spoenemann added this to the v1.2.0 milestone Apr 9, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Moving multiple containers does not show feedback move of internal edge bendpoints
3 participants