fix: add @types/superagent to dependencies #3
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request modifies the Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
commit: |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
package.json (1)
27-27: Consider the trade-offs of bundling type definitionsMoving
@types/superagentto runtime dependencies ensures TypeScript users have proper type support, but it increases the package size for non-TypeScript users. Consider documenting this decision in the README to explain the rationale.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
package.json(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
package.json (1)
27-28: Verify version compatibility between superagent and its types
Let's ensure the versions of superagent (^9.0.1) and @types/superagent (^8.1.9) are compatible.
✅ Verification successful
Let me try another approach to verify the version compatibility.
Version compatibility between superagent and @types/superagent appears compatible
The type definitions package @types/[email protected] is the latest version available and doesn't show any explicit version constraints with superagent. There are no open issues related to version compatibility with superagent 9.x in DefinitelyTyped repository. Since type definition packages typically maintain backward compatibility and the version numbers are close (8.x types for 9.x library), this combination should work correctly.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check version compatibility between superagent and its types
# Check if @types/superagent@^8.1.9 supports superagent@^9.0.1
gh api graphql -f query='
{
repository(owner: "DefinitelyTyped", name: "DefinitelyTyped") {
object(expression: "master:types/superagent/index.d.ts") {
... on Blob {
text
}
}
}
}' | jq -r '.data.repository.object.text' | grep -A 5 "Type definitions for superagent"
# Check for any reported compatibility issues
gh api graphql -f query='
{
repository(owner: "DefinitelyTyped", name: "DefinitelyTyped") {
issues(first: 5, states: OPEN, labels: ["superagent"], orderBy: {field: CREATED_AT, direction: DESC}) {
nodes {
title
body
createdAt
}
}
}
}'
Length of output: 627
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the package.json from @types/superagent to see supported versions
curl -s https://registry.npmjs.org/@types/superagent/8.1.9/package.json | jq '.typeScriptVersion, .dependencies'
# Also check if there are any version constraints in the latest @types/superagent
curl -s https://registry.npmjs.org/@types/superagent/latest | jq '.version, .typeScriptVersion, .dependencies'
Length of output: 363
[skip ci] ## [8.1.1](v8.1.0...v8.1.1) (2024-12-22) ### Bug Fixes * add @types/superagent to dependencies ([#3](#3)) ([ec0a012](ec0a012))
Summary by CodeRabbit
superagentlibrary to enhance type safety.@types/superagentfromdevDependenciestodependencies.