Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adapt w.r.t. coq/coq#19995. #887

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 15, 2025
Merged

Conversation

ppedrot
Copy link
Collaborator

@ppedrot ppedrot commented Jan 9, 2025

I kept the module representations opaque, I doubt that people rely on this through serlib given the mess that this data structure is.

@ejgallego ejgallego added this to the 0.2.3 milestone Jan 13, 2025
@SkySkimmer SkySkimmer marked this pull request as ready for review January 15, 2025 13:30
@SkySkimmer SkySkimmer merged commit 7c66d28 into ejgallego:main Jan 15, 2025
2 of 14 checks passed
@ppedrot ppedrot deleted the module-abstract-type branch January 15, 2025 13:32
@ejgallego
Copy link
Owner

Thanks @ppedrot , the original motivation to expose this was to build a kernel fuzzer, actually that's still an interesting project, let me know if you are interested.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants