-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 52
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Optimize multibuy database queries #469
base: next
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Optimize multibuy database queries #469
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'll have to run it locally to check things over, and verify that we have tests in place
I'll try to review this before summer ends. Probably after the current update has been finished |
@Mast3rwaf1z Vil du ikke være en king og review den her så Kresten kan få lidt fritid? |
|
Tager lige et kig senere, var lige til forelæsning |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Some small things, i think improves readability of the code, and removed some redundant constructor calls?
also i believe by using _
in a for loop prevents memory being allocated to the variable. really insignificant but hey, its good to have imo
Added the suggestions from Kresten and Thomas, which seems to be some good changes Co-authored-by: Kresten Laust <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Thomas Jensen <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
looks good, minor annoying naming issue
Fixes #357.