-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 73
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
update for v5 #370
Merged
Merged
update for v5 #370
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
14 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
ceed89b
update for v5
gurgunday 5058af6
update for v5
gurgunday 8fad58a
update for v5
gurgunday 2dd344a
update for v5
gurgunday b43ee4d
update for v5
gurgunday fa54adc
update for v5
gurgunday c3aaa99
update for v5
gurgunday 8b9dfab
update for v5
gurgunday cfa0878
update for v5
gurgunday e850db2
update for v5
gurgunday b084c93
update for v5
gurgunday 69af565
update for v5
gurgunday 1c7a8a2
update for v5
gurgunday 1293a43
update for v5
gurgunday File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -1,9 +1,4 @@ | ||
jobs: 1 | ||
|
||
branches: 96 | ||
functions: 100 | ||
lines: 100 | ||
statements: 98 | ||
|
||
disable-coverage: true | ||
files: | ||
- test/**/*.test.js |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Isn't it better to impose a fixed limit, so that we're aware when the code coverage drop?
Maybe we can open an issue to increase code coverage if possible.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes
I'm not aware if that exists in tap@20, happy to add it back if so
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yep, they broke a few things.
Maybe it's better to fix coverage in an independent PR, will take a look tomorrow