Blogpost handling asynchronous tasks part2

[Nlea]

No description provided.

[cloudflare-workers-and-pages]

Deploying fpx-www with    Cloudflare Pages

Latest commit:	1a9861f
Status:	✅  Deploy successful!
Preview URL:	https://75235287.fpx-www.pages.dev
Branch Preview URL:	https://blogpost-handling-asynchrono.fpx-www.pages.dev

View logs

[brettimus]

just did a first pass, going to review the part ii post now

[brettimus]

so a possible thing to do in the future: you can permalink to a specific point in time (commit) in your repo, so you won't have to update links in blog posts when you restructure the repo

[brettimus]

not sure you wanted to change this image? the queue architecture image doesn't seem to match the description of the preceding sentence

[brettimus]

i ran format on the astro codebase and that's what changed some of the stuff in this post, just fyi

[brettimus]

I think we could publish this pretty much as-is if you're ready to move on.

Otherwise, if you're willing to do another pass, here are my thoughts:

I think we could trim down all the explanations of queues and various strategies for working with queues. Here's how you could maybe do that:

• First, look at exactly what you want/need to implement to accomplish the email sending via a queue
• Second, touch up the intro with a bulleted-list that explains what you're going to implement
• Third, remove as much additional content on queues as possible, covering only the basics someone would need to know to understand what you're implementing
• Fourth, rejig the conclusion to recap what you did (similar to the list in the intro)
• Finally, save your learnings/explanations of queues somewhere, possibly for a bigger post on queues

Other notes:

• The Service Bindings section flows well, but the transition into type safety is a lot, all of a sudden. Maybe move the type safety section to after the execution patterns, since it's more of an implementation detail.

• The Queues section has good content but could benefit from a clearer distinction between the conceptual overview and the implementation details. Consider adding a brief overview paragraph before going into the setup.

• The limitations section at the end feels a bit disconnected. Could add it a lil earlier when discussing local development, or frame it more clearly as "Development Considerations."

• The conclusion effectively sets up Part 3, but could benefit from a stronger summary of the key takeaways from Part 2 before transitioning to the preview of Part 3.

[Nlea]

@brettimus I tried my best to include your feedback. Could you give it a new read? That would be super helpful! Thanks