[flyte deck] Streaming Decks #2779

Future-Outlier · 2024-10-01T13:06:39Z

Tracking issue

Why are the changes needed?

we want to support streaming decks.

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

add a function publish for the Flyte Deck.

How was this patch tested?

from flytekit import ImageSpec, task, workflow
from flytekit.deck import Deck

flytekit_hash = "6b55930d0a77efc3594ebaac056f2c75024e61b5"
flytekit = f"git+https://github.com/flyteorg/flytekit.git@{flytekit_hash}"

# Define custom image for the task
custom_image = ImageSpec(packages=[flytekit],
                            apt_packages=["git"],
                            registry="localhost:30000",
                            env={"FLYTE_SDK_LOGGING_LEVEL": 10},
                         )

@task(enable_deck=False, container_image=custom_image)
def t_no_deck():
    # Deck.publish()
    print("No Deck")

@task(enable_deck=True, container_image=custom_image)
def t_deck():
    import time
    """
    1st deck only show timeline deck
    2nd will show
    """
    for i in range(3):
        Deck.publish()
        time.sleep(1)

@task(enable_deck=True, container_image=custom_image)
def t_fail_deck():
    import time

    for i in range(3):
        Deck.publish()
        time.sleep(3)
    time.sleep(10)
    raise ValueError("Failed Deck")

@workflow
def wf():
    t_no_deck()
    t_deck()
    t_fail_deck()

if __name__ == "__main__":
    from flytekit.clis.sdk_in_container import pyflyte
    from click.testing import CliRunner
    import os

    runner = CliRunner()
    path = os.path.realpath(__file__)

    result = runner.invoke(pyflyte.main,
                           ["run", path, "t_no_deck"])
    print("Local Execution: ", result.output)

    result = runner.invoke(pyflyte.main,
                           ["run", "--remote", path,"wf"])
    print("Remote Execution: ", result.output)

Setup process

single binary.

flyte: flyteorg/flyte#6053
flytekit: #2779
flyteconsole: flyteorg/flyteconsole#890

Screenshots

flytekit: this branch

NEW FLYTEKIT, NO DECK, RUNNING With Deck, SUCCEED, and FAILED

OSS-STREAMING-DECK-small.mov

OLD FLYTEKIT, NO DECK, RUNNING With Deck, SUCCEED, and FAILED

OSS-STREAMING-DECK-OLD-FLYTEKIT-small.mov

Check all the applicable boxes

I updated the documentation accordingly.
All new and existing tests passed.
All commits are signed-off.

Related PRs

Docs link

Summary by Bito

Implementation of streaming deck functionality in Flytekit, featuring Deck.publish() method and infrastructure updates. Enhanced deck generation in base_task.py with proper protobuf boolean wrappers and parameter documentation. Refactored deck enabling mechanism by removing legacy flags and implementing builder pattern. Updated from positive to negative logic check and aligned test assertions with new implementation.

Unit tests added: True

Estimated effort to review (1-5, lower is better): 2

Signed-off-by: Future-Outlier <[email protected]>

codecov · 2024-10-01T13:49:45Z

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 82.79%. Comparing base (f99d50e) to head (dc6d203).
Report is 30 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #2779       +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage   51.08%   82.79%   +31.71%     
===========================================
  Files         201        3      -198     
  Lines       21231      186    -21045     
  Branches     2731        0     -2731     
===========================================
- Hits        10846      154    -10692     
+ Misses       9787       32     -9755     
+ Partials      598        0      -598

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Signed-off-by: Future-Outlier <[email protected]>

kumare3 · 2024-10-09T04:14:45Z

I would love to see an example of tqdm

kumare3 · 2024-10-09T04:34:48Z

replaces #1704

Future-Outlier · 2024-10-09T04:38:18Z

I would love to see an example of tqdm

will try it, just let me ship the MSGPACK IDL first.

EngHabu · 2024-10-09T15:57:25Z

flytekit/deck/deck.py

+<html lang="en">
+<head>
+    <meta charset="UTF-8">
+    <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0">


This will make it automatically refresh the page.. probably need that on the empty deck but not sure how to do the realtime behavior once it has content (you don't want to refresh while the user is browsing around or clicking through various tabs)

Suggested change

<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0">

<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0">

<meta http-equiv="refresh" content="5" >

COOL, will try it, thank you

Signed-off-by: Future-Outlier <[email protected]>

flyte-bot · 2025-01-02T13:58:46Z

Code Review Agent Run #24744d

Actionable Suggestions - 2

flytekit/deck/deck.py - 1
- Consider using more specific exception type · Line 96-97
flytekit/core/base_task.py - 1
- Consider combining deck disable checks · Line 726-728

Additional Suggestions - 1

flytekit/core/context_manager.py - 1
- Consider adding type hints for attribute · Line 194-194

Review Details

Files reviewed - 7 · Commit Range: 01182b4..7bcf15e
- flytekit/bin/entrypoint.py
- flytekit/core/base_task.py
- flytekit/core/constants.py
- flytekit/core/context_manager.py
- flytekit/deck/deck.py
- flytekit/models/task.py
- flytekit/tools/translator.py
Files skipped - 0
Tools
- Whispers (Secret Scanner) - ✔︎ Successful
- Detect-secrets (Secret Scanner) - ✔︎ Successful
- MyPy (Static Code Analysis) - ✔︎ Successful
- Astral Ruff (Static Code Analysis) - ✔︎ Successful

AI Code Review powered by

Signed-off-by: Future-Outlier <[email protected]>

flyte-bot · 2025-01-02T14:05:39Z

Changelist by Bito

This pull request implements the following key changes.

Key Change	Files Impacted
Feature Improvement - Streaming Deck Implementation	- `Dockerfile.dev` - Updated flyteidl dependency to streaming-deck-v2 branch - `entrypoint.py` - Updated _output_deck function parameters for better clarity - `base_task.py` - Added generates_deck flag and related functionality - `deck.py` - Implemented Deck.publish() method and improved deck generation logic - `task.py` - Added generates_deck property and related metadata handling - `translator.py` - Enhanced task serialization to support deck generation
Testing - Deck Feature Testing	- `test_translator.py` - Added comprehensive tests for deck functionality

flyte-bot · 2025-01-02T14:05:41Z

flytekit/deck/deck.py

+            # todo: change to a more proper error
+            raise ValueError("Deck is disabled for this task, please don't call Deck.publish()")


Consider using more specific exception type

Consider using a more specific exception type like DeckDisabledException instead of ValueError to better communicate the error condition. The TODO comment also suggests this needs improvement.

Code suggestion

Check the AI-generated fix before applying

Suggested change

# todo: change to a more proper error

raise ValueError("Deck is disabled for this task, please don't call Deck.publish()")

class DeckDisabledException(Exception):

pass

raise DeckDisabledException("Deck is disabled for this task, please don't call Deck.publish()")

Code Review Run #24744d

Is this a valid issue, or was it incorrectly flagged by the Agent?

it was incorrectly flagged

flyte-bot · 2025-01-02T14:05:42Z

flytekit/core/base_task.py

+        if not self.disable_deck:
+            ctx.user_space_params._enable_deck = True  # type: ignore
+        if DeckField.TIMELINE.value in self.deck_fields and ctx.user_space_params is not None and not self.disable_deck:


Consider combining deck disable checks

Consider combining the two conditional checks into a single condition to avoid redundant disable_deck checks. The current implementation checks disable_deck twice which introduces redundancy.

Code suggestion

Check the AI-generated fix before applying

Suggested change

if not self.disable_deck:

ctx.user_space_params._enable_deck = True # type: ignore

if DeckField.TIMELINE.value in self.deck_fields and ctx.user_space_params is not None and not self.disable_deck:

if not self.disable_deck and ctx.user_space_params is not None:

ctx.user_space_params._enable_deck = True

if DeckField.TIMELINE.value in self.deck_fields:

Code Review Run #24744d

Is this a valid issue, or was it incorrectly flagged by the Agent?

it was incorrectly flagged

yeah we can do this, small change.

Signed-off-by: Future-Outlier <[email protected]>

Future-Outlier · 2025-01-02T14:51:58Z

FYI @fg91 since you also want to use it. would love to get your feedback

I'm a big fan of such a feature - being able to publish realtime updates from a task to flyte console was the topic of various discussions in the past (e.g. this or this):
    # A very similar API was discussed back then:
    deck = flytekit.Deck("Summary", ...)
    deck.append(MarkdownRenderer.to_html(f"... {run.link} ..."))
    deck.flush()
I have one question about the implementation. Does flytepropeller need to detect whenever the deck html in the bucket changed for the change to be reflected in the UI or does propeller only indicate to the task where to upload the deck to but a request from flyteconsole directly "goes to the bucket" without flytepropeller having to do further work?

flyteconsole will send a request to flyteadmin, and flyteadmin will give it the deck html

flyte-bot · 2025-01-02T15:08:47Z

Code Review Agent Run #75fbe2

Actionable Suggestions - 0

Review Details

Files reviewed - 3 · Commit Range: 7bcf15e..be02f9f
- flytekit/core/base_task.py
- flytekit/deck/deck.py
- flytekit/tools/translator.py
Files skipped - 0
Tools
- Whispers (Secret Scanner) - ✔︎ Successful
- Detect-secrets (Secret Scanner) - ✔︎ Successful
- MyPy (Static Code Analysis) - ✔︎ Successful
- Astral Ruff (Static Code Analysis) - ✔︎ Successful

AI Code Review powered by

wild-endeavor · 2025-01-06T20:43:37Z

flytekit/tools/translator.py

+        if isinstance(entity.task_function, ClassDecorator):
+            extra_config = entity.task_function.get_extra_config()
+        if not entity.disable_deck:
+            entity.metadata.generates_deck = True


can we add this to a unit test?

wild-endeavor · 2025-01-06T20:45:16Z

flytekit/deck/deck.py

+            _output_deck(task_name=task_name, new_user_params=params)
+        else:
+            # todo: change to a more proper error
+            raise ValueError("Deck is disabled for this task, please don't call Deck.publish()")


Should we just log a warning instead of raising an error? the warning can say that the call to publish is being ignored. that way the task can continue to function.

Also let's remove the warning on line 46: "This feature is in beta."

ok I'm going to call warning

flytekit/core/constants.py

wild-endeavor · 2025-01-06T20:46:11Z

flytekit/core/base_task.py

+        if not self.disable_deck:
+            ctx.user_space_params._enable_deck = True  # type: ignore
+        if DeckField.TIMELINE.value in self.deck_fields and ctx.user_space_params is not None and not self.disable_deck:


yeah we can do this, small change.

wild-endeavor · 2025-01-06T21:13:09Z

flytekit/core/base_task.py

@@ -720,7 +723,9 @@ def dispatch_execute(
          may be none
        * ``DynamicJobSpec`` is returned when a dynamic workflow is executed
        """
-        if DeckField.TIMELINE.value in self.deck_fields and ctx.user_space_params is not None:
+        if not self.disable_deck:
+            ctx.user_space_params._enable_deck = True  # type: ignore


since the ExecutionParams object has a builder, maybe we should use it here instead of accessing a private field?

ok I'll move it to the builder, thank you

wild-endeavor · 2025-01-06T21:14:19Z

flytekit/deck/deck.py

@@ -86,6 +86,16 @@ def name(self) -> str:
    def html(self) -> str:
        return self._html

+    @classmethod


technically this can be static right?

yes static is better I think

since static method is bound to a class rather than the objects for that class.

reference: https://www.digitalocean.com/community/tutorials/python-static-method

wild-endeavor · 2025-01-06T21:15:09Z

flytekit/deck/deck.py

@@ -86,6 +86,16 @@ def name(self) -> str:
    def html(self) -> str:
        return self._html

+    @classmethod
+    def publish(cls):


Deck.publish, pulls the ExecutionParams from the current flytekit context, and calls _output_deck, which again calls the current context to get at the file_access code, to do an upload. what do you think about moving this error check inside _output_deck? making this function just a wrapper around that?

yes we can do this, this can make the code more efficient

now it changed to warning, and move the logic to _output_deck

Signed-off-by: Future-Outlier <[email protected]>

…to _output_deck Signed-off-by: Future-Outlier <[email protected]>

Signed-off-by: Future-Outlier <[email protected]>

flyte-bot · 2025-01-09T00:54:37Z

Code Review Agent Run #6220fd

Actionable Suggestions - 2

flytekit/deck/deck.py - 2
- Consider adding task_id null check · Line 88-89
- Consider adding None check for params · Line 184-185

Review Details

Files reviewed - 3 · Commit Range: be02f9f..dc6d203
- flytekit/core/base_task.py
- flytekit/core/constants.py
- flytekit/deck/deck.py
Files skipped - 1
- .github/workflows/monodocs_build.yml - Reason: Filter setting
Tools
- Whispers (Secret Scanner) - ✔︎ Successful
- Detect-secrets (Secret Scanner) - ✔︎ Successful
- MyPy (Static Code Analysis) - ✔︎ Successful
- Astral Ruff (Static Code Analysis) - ✔︎ Successful

AI Code Review powered by

flyte-bot · 2025-01-09T00:57:40Z

flytekit/deck/deck.py

+        task_name = params.task_id.name
+        _output_deck(task_name=task_name, new_user_params=params)


Consider adding task_id null check

Consider checking if params.task_id is not None before accessing the name attribute to avoid potential NoneType errors.

Code suggestion

Check the AI-generated fix before applying

@@ -87,3 +87,6 @@ def publish(): params = FlyteContextManager.current_context().user_space_params - task_name = params.task_id.name - _output_deck(task_name=task_name, new_user_params=params) + if params.task_id is None: + raise ValueError("Task ID is not available in the current context") + task_name = params.task_id.name + _output_deck(task_name=task_name, new_user_params=params)

Code Review Run #6220fd

Is this a valid issue, or was it incorrectly flagged by the Agent?

it was incorrectly flagged

flyte-bot · 2025-01-09T00:57:41Z

flytekit/deck/deck.py

+    if not params.enable_deck:
+        logger.warning("Deck is disabled for this task, please don't call Deck.publish()")


Consider adding None check for params

Consider checking params for None before accessing enable_deck attribute to avoid potential NoneType attribute errors.

Code suggestion

Check the AI-generated fix before applying

Suggested change

if not params.enable_deck:

logger.warning("Deck is disabled for this task, please don't call Deck.publish()")

if params is None or not params.enable_deck:

logger.warning("Deck is disabled for this task or context params are not available, please don't call Deck.publish()")

return

Code Review Run #6220fd

Is this a valid issue, or was it incorrectly flagged by the Agent?

it was incorrectly flagged

Signed-off-by: Future-Outlier <[email protected]>

flyte-bot · 2025-01-09T03:22:47Z

Code Review Agent Run #3bf552

Actionable Suggestions - 0

Review Details

Files reviewed - 1 · Commit Range: dc6d203..41d8760
- flytekit/core/base_task.py
Files skipped - 0
Tools
- Whispers (Secret Scanner) - ✔︎ Successful
- Detect-secrets (Secret Scanner) - ✔︎ Successful
- MyPy (Static Code Analysis) - ✔︎ Successful
- Astral Ruff (Static Code Analysis) - ✔︎ Successful

AI Code Review powered by

Signed-off-by: Future-Outlier <[email protected]>

flyte-bot · 2025-01-09T06:42:47Z

Code Review Agent Run #b6d959

Actionable Suggestions - 0

Additional Suggestions - 1

tests/flytekit/unit/test_translator.py - 1
- Consider more descriptive variable name · Line 96-101

Review Details

Files reviewed - 4 · Commit Range: 41d8760..b5976fe
- flytekit/core/base_task.py
- flytekit/core/context_manager.py
- flytekit/deck/deck.py
- tests/flytekit/unit/test_translator.py
Files skipped - 0
Tools
- Whispers (Secret Scanner) - ✔︎ Successful
- Detect-secrets (Secret Scanner) - ✔︎ Successful
- MyPy (Static Code Analysis) - ✔︎ Successful
- Astral Ruff (Static Code Analysis) - ✔︎ Successful

AI Code Review powered by

Signed-off-by: Future-Outlier <[email protected]>

flyte-bot · 2025-01-13T15:55:10Z

Code Review Agent Run #f6709f

Actionable Suggestions - 0

Review Details

Files reviewed - 1 · Commit Range: b5976fe..0c1a5a3
- flytekit/deck/deck.py
Files skipped - 0
Tools
- Whispers (Secret Scanner) - ✔︎ Successful
- Detect-secrets (Secret Scanner) - ✔︎ Successful
- MyPy (Static Code Analysis) - ✔︎ Successful
- Astral Ruff (Static Code Analysis) - ✔︎ Successful

AI Code Review powered by

Signed-off-by: Future-Outlier <[email protected]>

flyte-bot · 2025-01-13T17:08:23Z

Code Review Agent Run #7a0ea5

Actionable Suggestions - 0

Review Details

Files reviewed - 3 · Commit Range: 0c1a5a3..2764ed4
- Dockerfile.dev
- flytekit/core/base_task.py
- tests/flytekit/unit/test_translator.py
Files skipped - 1
- .github/workflows/monodocs_build.yml - Reason: Filter setting
Tools
- Whispers (Secret Scanner) - ✔︎ Successful
- Detect-secrets (Secret Scanner) - ✔︎ Successful
- MyPy (Static Code Analysis) - ✔︎ Successful
- Astral Ruff (Static Code Analysis) - ✔︎ Successful

AI Code Review powered by

Future-Outlier added 2 commits October 1, 2024 21:05

[Flyte Decl] Streaming Decks

01182b4

Signed-off-by: Future-Outlier <[email protected]>

print

9616fc3

Signed-off-by: Future-Outlier <[email protected]>

Future-Outlier added 4 commits October 1, 2024 23:17

sleep more

98ae7c7

Signed-off-by: Future-Outlier <[email protected]>

add dummy deck

4e92bb0

Signed-off-by: Future-Outlier <[email protected]>

nit

4df18b5

Signed-off-by: Future-Outlier <[email protected]>

dummy deck

ebb4d4e

Signed-off-by: Future-Outlier <[email protected]>

Future-Outlier changed the title ~~[Flyte Deck] Streaming Decks~~ [wip][Flyte Deck] Streaming Decks Oct 2, 2024

Future-Outlier added 12 commits October 2, 2024 14:12

update

99522d9

Signed-off-by: Future-Outlier <[email protected]>

nit

c19d67d

Signed-off-by: Future-Outlier <[email protected]>

test

67cd829

Signed-off-by: Future-Outlier <[email protected]>

return html

06da3df

Signed-off-by: Future-Outlier <[email protected]>

Change Deck

6d99d69

Signed-off-by: Future-Outlier <[email protected]>

fix

b805cd7

Signed-off-by: Future-Outlier <[email protected]>

fix recursion error

4c97758

Signed-off-by: Future-Outlier <[email protected]>

remove redundant code

7b3574a

Signed-off-by: Future-Outlier <[email protected]>

add dummy deck to deck init

9b60564

Signed-off-by: Future-Outlier <[email protected]>

Better Dummy Deck Logic

18c994f

Signed-off-by: Future-Outlier <[email protected]>

Merge branch 'master' into flytekit-streaming-deck

39f39d1

Deck Publish

aabcbbb

Signed-off-by: Future-Outlier <[email protected]>

EngHabu reviewed Oct 9, 2024

View reviewed changes

Future-Outlier added 4 commits November 25, 2024 21:48

Merge branch 'master' into flytekit-streaming-deck

9ca43f3

litn

ed56352

Signed-off-by: Future-Outlier <[email protected]>

remove dummy deck

b559fc9

Signed-off-by: Future-Outlier <[email protected]>

nit

fc5578f

Signed-off-by: Future-Outlier <[email protected]>

Future-Outlier changed the title ~~[wip][Flyte Deck] Streaming Decks~~ [flytepropeller][flyteadmin] Streaming Decks Nov 27, 2024

Future-Outlier changed the title ~~[flytepropeller][flyteadmin] Streaming Decks~~ [flyte deck] Streaming Decks Nov 27, 2024

raise error when disabled deck and called Deck.publish()

7bcf15e

Signed-off-by: Future-Outlier <[email protected]>

lint

b6c41c3

Signed-off-by: Future-Outlier <[email protected]>

flyte-bot reviewed Jan 2, 2025

View reviewed changes

lint

be02f9f

Signed-off-by: Future-Outlier <[email protected]>

wild-endeavor reviewed Jan 6, 2025

View reviewed changes

Future-Outlier added 5 commits January 9, 2025 07:52

update

cf83e06

Signed-off-by: Future-Outlier <[email protected]>

static method by YEE

e137328

Signed-off-by: Future-Outlier <[email protected]>

make Deck.publish more like a wrapper by moving enable deck checking …

a59a56e

…to _output_deck Signed-off-by: Future-Outlier <[email protected]>

lint

b8383be

Signed-off-by: Future-Outlier <[email protected]>

print monodocs err

dc6d203

Signed-off-by: Future-Outlier <[email protected]>

flyte-bot reviewed Jan 9, 2025

View reviewed changes

Fix monodocs

41d8760

Signed-off-by: Future-Outlier <[email protected]>

Future-Outlier added 2 commits January 9, 2025 13:34

use builder

b71cc19

Signed-off-by: Future-Outlier <[email protected]>

add translator test for deck serialization settings

b5976fe

Signed-off-by: Future-Outlier <[email protected]>

update

0c1a5a3

Signed-off-by: Future-Outlier <[email protected]>

Future-Outlier added 4 commits January 14, 2025 00:06

fix

d082456

Signed-off-by: Future-Outlier <[email protected]>

test

4a8c68f

Signed-off-by: Future-Outlier <[email protected]>

update

b58527b

Signed-off-by: Future-Outlier <[email protected]>

remove blank

2764ed4

Signed-off-by: Future-Outlier <[email protected]>

	<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0">
	<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0">
	<meta http-equiv="refresh" content="5" >

		# todo: change to a more proper error
		raise ValueError("Deck is disabled for this task, please don't call Deck.publish()")

		task_name = params.task_id.name
		_output_deck(task_name=task_name, new_user_params=params)

		if not params.enable_deck:
		logger.warning("Deck is disabled for this task, please don't call Deck.publish()")

[flyte deck] Streaming Decks #2779

Are you sure you want to change the base?

[flyte deck] Streaming Decks #2779

Conversation

Future-Outlier commented Oct 1, 2024 • edited by flyte-bot Loading

Tracking issue

Why are the changes needed?

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

How was this patch tested?

Setup process

Screenshots

NEW FLYTEKIT, NO DECK, RUNNING With Deck, SUCCEED, and FAILED

OLD FLYTEKIT, NO DECK, RUNNING With Deck, SUCCEED, and FAILED

Check all the applicable boxes

Related PRs

Docs link

Summary by Bito

codecov bot commented Oct 1, 2024 • edited Loading

Codecov Report

kumare3 commented Oct 9, 2024

kumare3 commented Oct 9, 2024

Future-Outlier commented Oct 9, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

flyte-bot commented Jan 2, 2025 • edited Loading

Code Review Agent Run #24744d

flyte-bot commented Jan 2, 2025 • edited Loading

Changelist by Bito

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Future-Outlier commented Jan 2, 2025

flyte-bot commented Jan 2, 2025 • edited Loading

Code Review Agent Run #75fbe2

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

flyte-bot commented Jan 9, 2025 • edited Loading

Code Review Agent Run #6220fd

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

flyte-bot commented Jan 9, 2025 • edited Loading

Code Review Agent Run #3bf552

flyte-bot commented Jan 9, 2025 • edited Loading

Code Review Agent Run #b6d959

flyte-bot commented Jan 13, 2025 • edited Loading

Code Review Agent Run #f6709f

flyte-bot commented Jan 13, 2025 • edited Loading

Code Review Agent Run #7a0ea5

Future-Outlier commented Oct 1, 2024 •

edited by flyte-bot

Loading

codecov bot commented Oct 1, 2024 •

edited

Loading

flyte-bot commented Jan 2, 2025 •

edited

Loading

flyte-bot commented Jan 2, 2025 •

edited

Loading

flyte-bot commented Jan 2, 2025 •

edited

Loading

flyte-bot commented Jan 9, 2025 •

edited

Loading

flyte-bot commented Jan 9, 2025 •

edited

Loading

flyte-bot commented Jan 9, 2025 •

edited

Loading

flyte-bot commented Jan 13, 2025 •

edited

Loading

flyte-bot commented Jan 13, 2025 •

edited

Loading