Backport of -agent-address flag should have higher precedence than the env var into release/1.18.x #28600
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Backport
This PR is auto-generated from #28574 to be assessed for backporting due to the inclusion of the label backport/1.18.x.
The below text is copied from the body of the original PR.
Description
Resolves #27404
The issue here, as I understand it, is that the
VAULT_AGENT_ADDR
environment variable takes higher precedence than the-agent-address
CLI flag, in violation of what our docs say about how CLI flags should take precedence. The people reporting and commenting on the issue provided a wonderful reproduction shell script that makes this problem easy to see.From what I can tell, NewClient is doing the right thing, by prioritizing the agent address over the regular address. The main problem is that the API client doesn't have access to CLI flags - it can only work from the config it's given.
I think the fix I've done here is correct, in that 1) the repro shell script now does the right thing in all cases, including the last one and also 2) nothing about the way the CLI parses its config has changed, so all the other callers of
api.NewClient()
will still get the same behavior they've always gotten.TODO only if you're a HashiCorp employee
to N, N-1, and N-2, using the
backport/ent/x.x.x+ent
labels. If this PR is in the CE repo, you should only backport to N, using thebackport/x.x.x
label, not the enterprise labels.of a public function, even if that change is in a CE file, double check that
applying the patch for this PR to the ENT repo and running tests doesn't
break any tests. Sometimes ENT only tests rely on public functions in CE
files.
in the PR description, commit message, or branch name.
description. Also, make sure the changelog is in this PR, not in your ENT PR.
Overview of commits