-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 671
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Avoid test failure by not checking exact size of backup #5594
Conversation
This is a workaround for the fact that the backup size is not exactly the same every time. This is due to the fact that the inner gziped tar file can vary in size due to difference in json file (key order) and potentially also different field values (UUID, backup slug). It seems that sorting the keys makes the actual difference today, but this has runtime overhead and might not catch all cases. Simply check if size property is there and a number bigger than 0 instead.
Warning Rate limit exceeded@agners has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 11 minutes and 51 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe pull request modifies the Changes
The modification allows the test to be more robust by ensuring the backup has a non-zero size, rather than expecting a precise byte count. This approach accommodates potential variations in backup generation while maintaining the verification of the backup's protected status. Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good, won't have any potential side-effects as #5593 👍
Proposed change
This is a workaround for the fact that the backup size is not exactly the same every time. This is due to the fact that the inner gziped tar file can vary in size due to difference in json file (key order) and potentially also different field values (UUID, backup slug).
It seems that sorting the keys makes the actual difference today, but this has runtime overhead and might not catch all cases.
Simply check if size property is there and a number bigger than 0 instead.
Type of change
Additional information
Checklist
ruff format supervisor tests
)If API endpoints or add-on configuration are added/changed:
Summary by CodeRabbit