Workflow to approve integration tests from forks #588
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
A bot explains to contributors and maintainers what's going on and what the next steps are.
|
I will automatically update this comment whenever this PR is modified |
4 tasks
|
Superceded by #617 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Follow up on #580.
Important
Preventing Pwn Requests is important.
Secrets exfiltration is a risk if we try to allow integration tests that use secrets to run on PRs from forks.
I took a stab and ran in to a wall. Taking a pause on this to focus on other high priorities. I may be entirely misguided in my approach. Any expertise would be appreciated :)