Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

update fees info #21

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 23, 2025
Merged

update fees info #21

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion README.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -175,4 +175,4 @@ Some market makers may not wish to be the ones handling the sending of transacti

### Fees

We will likely introduce a fee in the range bps applied to the MM, based on total filled volume. More details to be announced on the introduction of fees on Jupiter RFQ. Currently, we welcome all MMs to integrate Jupiter RFQ with 0 fees for a limited, testing period.
Jupiter RFQ allows MMs a way to provide liquidity, adjust their quotes without being subject to the volatility of on-chain gas prices or chain health. RFQ fills are also much less CU intensive (<10x) compared to AMM swaps, and can save gas in the long run on fills. Today, RFQ charges a 2bps flat fee on all volume (doesn't matter tokens or size). Expect this to go more dynamic to allow MMs to have an edge on all swap sizes and pairs in the future.
Loading