Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(organization): export organization users asynchronously from Admin interface TASK-1478 #5448

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: release/2.024.36
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

noliveleger
Copy link
Contributor

📣 Summary

Added asynchronous export functionality for organization usersImproved performance for exporting users in large databases.

📖 Description

This update introduces asynchronous processing for exporting organization users, enabling smoother handling of large datasets. The new functionality ensures that user exports can be performed efficiently without overloading the system, even on large databases.

👀 Preview steps

Feature/no-change template:

  1. Set your SMTP if it has not been set already
  2. Go to Organizations > Organizations Users
  3. Select the users you want to export
  4. Use bulk action "Export with Celery" (confirm the export)
  5. Wait for the confirmation email that the export has succeeded

@noliveleger noliveleger added enhancement Ideas, improvements and features Back end labels Jan 23, 2025
@noliveleger noliveleger requested a review from Guitlle January 23, 2025 21:33
@noliveleger noliveleger self-assigned this Jan 23, 2025
@noliveleger noliveleger changed the title feat(organization): export organization users asynchronously from Admin interface feat(organization): export organization users asynchronously from Admin interface TASK-1478 Jan 23, 2025
@noliveleger noliveleger force-pushed the task-1478-async-org-exports branch from e49ba76 to 22556a5 Compare January 24, 2025 16:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Back end enhancement Ideas, improvements and features
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants