Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix typo #83

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 3, 2024
Merged

Fix typo #83

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 3, 2024

Conversation

dqunbp
Copy link
Collaborator

@dqunbp dqunbp commented Dec 3, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Minor formatting adjustments made for improved readability in the cache management functions.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 3, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request involve minor formatting adjustments to the cachePurgeMosaic function in the src/cache.mjs file. Specifically, spaces were added after the + operator in two instances related to directory operations. These modifications do not impact the code's logic or functionality, and the overall structure, control flow, and error handling mechanisms remain unchanged.

Changes

File Change Summary
src/cache.mjs Added spaces after + operator in cachePurgeMosaic function for fs.promises.rmdir and fs.promises.mkdir calls. No functional changes.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant C as Cache Module
    participant FS as File System
    C->>FS: rmdir(__mosaic256__)
    FS-->>C: Directory Removed
    C->>FS: mkdir(__mosaic256__)
    FS-->>C: Directory Created
Loading

Poem

In the code where rabbits play,
Formatting changes come to stay.
A space here, a space there,
Neat and tidy, with love and care.
Hopping through functions, all is bright,
Clean code makes the day feel right! 🐇✨


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7a11016 and d3f8e34.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/cache.mjs (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/cache.mjs (1)

44-44: LGTM! Consider consistent formatting across the codebase.

The spacing changes after the + operators improve readability. However, to maintain consistency, we should verify if similar string concatenations in other parts of the codebase follow the same style.

Also applies to: 49-49

✅ Verification successful

String concatenation style is already consistent

Looking at the codebase, we can see that template literals (`${TILES_CACHE_DIR_PATH}/${dir}`) are consistently used throughout the file for path construction, with the only exception being the TMP_DIR_PATH constant which uses the + operator. The PR's formatting changes align with the predominant style in the file, making the code more consistent overall.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check string concatenation patterns in the codebase
# Look for similar string concatenations to ensure consistent formatting

# Search for string concatenations with TILES_CACHE_DIR_PATH
rg "TILES_CACHE_DIR_PATH \+ |\+ .*TILES_CACHE_DIR_PATH" --type js --type mjs

# Search for general string concatenations with +
rg "[\"'`][^+]+\+|\+[^+]+[\"'`]" --type js --type mjs

Length of output: 309


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to check string concatenation patterns
# Search for string concatenations without file type restrictions

# Search for string concatenations with TILES_CACHE_DIR_PATH
rg "TILES_CACHE_DIR_PATH.*\+"

# Search for general string concatenations in JavaScript-like files
fd -e js -e mjs -x rg -l "['\"`][^+]+\+|\+[^+]+['\"`]" {} \;

Length of output: 586


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the actual string concatenation patterns in the codebase
# Using simpler pattern matching and showing the context

# Look for string concatenations in cache.mjs
rg -A 1 -B 1 "\+" src/cache.mjs

# Look for TILES_CACHE_DIR_PATH usage
rg -A 1 -B 1 "TILES_CACHE_DIR_PATH" src/cache.mjs

Length of output: 1814


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@dqunbp dqunbp merged commit cb33660 into main Dec 3, 2024
3 checks passed
@dqunbp dqunbp deleted the feature/fix-typo branch December 3, 2024 14:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants