Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix Grammar and Documentation Issues #430

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

Hopium21
Copy link

Changes:

  1. kroma-chain-ops/cmd/check-kroma-mgt/main.go:
  • "fee distribution unexpectedly"
  • "fee distribution unexpected"
    Reason: Fixed grammatical error by using correct adjective form.
  1. kroma-chain-ops/crossdomain/message_test.go:
  • // TestEncode tests the hash of a CrossDomainMessage.
  • // TestHash tests the hash of a CrossDomainMessage.
    Reason: Fixed incorrect function name in comment to match actual function.

@Hopium21 Hopium21 requested a review from a team as a code owner January 26, 2025 13:00
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 26, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request contains minor modifications in two files within the kroma-chain-ops repository. The changes involve a slight grammatical adjustment in an error message in the check-kroma-mpt command and a correction of a test function's comment description in a cross-domain message test file. These changes are primarily cosmetic and do not impact the functional behavior of the code.

Changes

File Change Summary
kroma-chain-ops/cmd/check-kroma-mpt/main.go Modified error message from "fee distribution unexpectedly" to "fee distribution unexpected"
kroma-chain-ops/crossdomain/message_test.go Updated comment for TestHash function to correctly describe its purpose

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c41ac14 and 5cf392d.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • kroma-chain-ops/cmd/check-kroma-mpt/main.go (1 hunks)
  • kroma-chain-ops/crossdomain/message_test.go (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
  • kroma-chain-ops/cmd/check-kroma-mpt/main.go
  • kroma-chain-ops/crossdomain/message_test.go

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@Pangssu
Copy link
Contributor

Pangssu commented Jan 26, 2025

Please rename your commits and PRs to match the rules.
See the links below for the rules for commit and PR names.

https://github.com/kroma-network/kroma/blob/dev/.gitmessage
https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/v1.0.0/

@Hopium21 Hopium21 closed this by deleting the head repository Jan 27, 2025
@Hopium21
Copy link
Author

#432

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants