Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Change Tagging of verbatim #1630

Open
wants to merge 18 commits into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Change Tagging of verbatim #1630

wants to merge 18 commits into from

Conversation

u-fischer
Copy link
Member

This changes the tagging of verbatim to use Code on the "outside" and Sub for the Codelines. This is now possible as verapdf has now implemented (in the development version, the release will follow soon) the change in the spec that allows this parent-child relation ship. Tagpdf is updated to the current version too.

Status of pull request

  • Ready to merge

Checklist of required changes before merge will be approved

  • Test file(s) added/updated
  • Version and date string updated in changed source files
  • Relevant \changes entries in source included
  • Relevant changes.txt updated
  • [n/a] Rollback provided (if necessary)?
  • [n/a] ltnewsX.tex (and/or latexchanges.tex) updated

Copy link
Member

@FrankMittelbach FrankMittelbach left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

with one editorial comment

@@ -3892,17 +3893,22 @@
%
% \begin{instance}{blockenv verbatim}
%
% The rolemapping is currently \struct{verbatim} to \struct{P} and
% The rolemapping is \struct{verbatim} to \struct{Code} and
% \struct{codeline} to \struct{Sub} (which is role mapped
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

closing ) missing?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants