Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Order of the reactions with the usage of EEDF #103

Open
ananthanarasimhanj opened this issue May 24, 2023 · 3 comments
Open

Order of the reactions with the usage of EEDF #103

ananthanarasimhanj opened this issue May 24, 2023 · 3 comments

Comments

@ananthanarasimhanj
Copy link

ananthanarasimhanj commented May 24, 2023

Three reactions are solved as a simple test case. Two reactions use “EEDF” to obtain rate coefficients from the external data file, and the third one has a constant rate coefficient.

ISSUE:
If the the reaction that uses “EEDF” is given as last, there is error in running the input file. But, if the reactions that use the EEDF are given first followed by the reaction that use constant rate coefficient as last, the input file runs OK. I am sharing both the input file for reference, and sharing below the reaction info used in both the input files.

  1. Reaction order when issue was faced (FOLDER: EEDF-ISSUE_PROBLEM):

'e + Ar -> e + e + Ar+ : EEDF (ionization)
e + Ar -> e + Ar* : EEDF (excitation)
e + Ar+ + Ar -> Ar + Ar : 1e-25'

  1. Reaction order when the issue was resolved (FOLDER: EEDF-ISSUE_FIXED):

reactions = 'e + Ar -> e + e + Ar+ : EEDF (ionization)
e + Ar+ + Ar -> Ar + Ar : 1e-25
e + Ar -> e + Ar* : EEDF (excitation)'

  1. Also, for the input which contains just one reaction that calls for EEDF, worked just fine (shown below the reaction from input file, uploaded FOLDER: EEDF-ISSUE_FIXED2):

reactions = 'e + Ar -> e + e + Ar+ : EEDF (ionization)'

Input files for above three cases are in the uploaded zip "ISSUES" for your review. The error message is uploaded as text file.

ISSUES.zip

ERROR .txt

@smpeyres smpeyres added the bug Something isn't working label May 24, 2023
@smpeyres
Copy link
Collaborator

Ananth, thank you very much for providing this! For the sake of documentation, can you also provide the error message you get when you run the problematic input file? You can put it along in ISSUES.zip.

@ananthanarasimhanj
Copy link
Author

ananthanarasimhanj commented May 24, 2023

Hi, below is the error message. It is also added along with the ZIP uploaded earlier.

*** ERROR ***
Unable to open file "data/excitation". Check to make sure that it exists and that you have read permission.

@dcurreli
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks Ananth! We need to add a warning in the documentation telling that cross-section-based reactions should be listed first. Or fix this in the code.

@dcurreli dcurreli removed the bug Something isn't working label Sep 5, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants