Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

sync: from linuxdeepin/dtkcore #62

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 8, 2024
Merged

sync: from linuxdeepin/dtkcore #62

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 8, 2024

Conversation

deepin-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Synchronize source files from linuxdeepin/dtkcore.

Source-pull-request: linuxdeepin/dtkcore#429

@deepin-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor Author

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: deepin-ci-robot

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@deepin-ci-robot deepin-ci-robot force-pushed the sync-pr-429-nosync branch 4 times, most recently from 307acd4 to ffacd44 Compare June 27, 2024 09:50
@deepin-bot
Copy link
Contributor

deepin-bot bot commented Jun 27, 2024

TAG Bot

New tag: 6.0.17
DISTRIBUTION: unstable
Suggest: synchronizing this PR through rebase #61

@deepin-ci-robot deepin-ci-robot force-pushed the sync-pr-429-nosync branch 3 times, most recently from 43970f6 to df0b70b Compare June 28, 2024 07:39
Synchronize source files from linuxdeepin/dtkcore.

Source-pull-request: linuxdeepin/dtkcore#429
@deepin-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor Author

deepin pr auto review

Fix unit test for rolling file appender

@kegechen kegechen merged commit e58bdbc into master Jul 8, 2024
9 of 13 checks passed
@kegechen kegechen deleted the sync-pr-429-nosync branch July 8, 2024 01:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants