Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DM-48635 Add tooling for local testing of consdb #67

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Jan 30, 2025
Merged

Conversation

bbrondel
Copy link
Collaborator

This addition creates the ability to easily set up a local deployment of consdb. The steps are

  1. Make sure you have Docker and Docker Compose
  2. Gather some header service YAML files (optional)
  3. Create a local .env file following the instructions in docker-compose.yml (optional)
  4. Run docker compose up --build in the extras directory

@JeremyMcCormick
Copy link
Contributor

JeremyMcCormick commented Jan 28, 2025

Minor suggestion: I would put container-related config in a top-level directory called docker rather than extras and then organize its content accordingly. This is the convention I have seen most other projects use for these types of files.

@bbrondel bbrondel changed the title Add tooling for local testing of consdb DM-48635 Add tooling for local testing of consdb Jan 29, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I noticed this file was added, but I’m not entirely sure how it fits into the current changes. Any particular reason?

Copy link

@rcboufleur rcboufleur left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me!

@bbrondel bbrondel merged commit 528a497 into main Jan 30, 2025
7 checks passed
@bbrondel bbrondel deleted the tickets/DM-48635 branch January 30, 2025 15:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants