Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix special augmentations with no bboxes #232

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 22, 2025
Merged

Conversation

kozlov721
Copy link
Collaborator

Fix for augmentation of classification, array and metadata tasks when no associated bbox task exists.

@kozlov721 kozlov721 requested a review from a team as a code owner January 21, 2025 05:54
@kozlov721 kozlov721 requested review from klemen1999, tersekmatija and conorsim and removed request for a team January 21, 2025 05:54
@github-actions github-actions bot added the fix Fixing a bug label Jan 21, 2025
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 21, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 95.79%. Comparing base (27657d6) to head (4cfbec5).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #232   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   95.78%   95.79%           
=======================================
  Files          89       90    +1     
  Lines        4771     4781   +10     
=======================================
+ Hits         4570     4580   +10     
  Misses        201      201           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@kozlov721 kozlov721 merged commit a04af9a into main Jan 22, 2025
12 checks passed
@kozlov721 kozlov721 deleted the fix/augmentations-no-bbox branch January 22, 2025 18:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
fix Fixing a bug
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants