feat: begins the work to support single vs multi root_module_structure #17
Conversation
Gowiem
force-pushed
the
feat/structure-modes-take1
branch
from
c17487a to
c693d93
Compare
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces comprehensive changes to the Spacelift Automation module, focusing on enhancing configuration management, documentation, and testing. The modifications include updates to Renovate configuration, README documentation, example root modules, and test cases. The primary goal is to improve the flexibility of stack management by introducing support for both MultiInstance and SingleInstance structures, along with refined configuration handling and expanded testing coverage. Changes
Suggested reviewersPossibly related PRs
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Nitpick comments (15)
examples/single-instance/root-modules/random-pet/main.tf (1)
1-3: Validate input constraints for random_pet resource.
While referencing var.length is straightforward, you might consider adding a safeguard in the variable definition to ensure it’s within a sensible range. This can help avoid errors or overly long names.examples/single-instance/root-modules/random-pet/variables.tf (1)
1-4: Add validation checks for variable length.
Defining a validation block can help catch misuse (e.g., negative numbers). This ensures the generated random pet names are consistently sized.For example:
variable "length" { description = "The length of the random name" type = number validation { condition = var.length > 0 error_message = "length must be greater than 0." } }tests/fixtures/single-instance/root-module-a/stack.yaml (1)
1-6: Encourage thorough test coverage of before_init commands.
Adding a test case to confirm that the before_init commands execute successfully during stack creation can help ensure that future modifications don’t break this functionality.examples/single-instance/root-modules/random-pet/stack.yaml (1)
1-7: LGTM! Consider adding environment labelThe stack configuration is well-structured with clear settings. Consider adding an environment label (e.g., 'dev', 'prod') to help with stack organization and filtering.
stack_settings: manage_state: true description: This stack generates random pet names labels: - common_label - stack_specific_label + - environment:devexamples/single-instance/root-modules/spacelift-automation/main.tf (1)
4-6: Enhance GitHub Enterprise configurationThe GitHub Enterprise configuration could benefit from additional settings for better control and clarity.
github_enterprise = { namespace = "masterpointio" + branch = "main" + webhook_enabled = true }examples/single-instance/root-modules/spacelift-automation/backend.tf.json (1)
1-18: Consider using native HCL instead of JSONWhile JSON is valid for Terraform configuration, HCL is more maintainable and supports comments and expressions natively.
terraform { backend "s3" { workspace_key_prefix = "terraform-spacelift-automation" acl = "bucket-owner-full-control" bucket = var.state_bucket dynamodb_table = var.state_lock_table encrypt = true key = "single-instance.tfstate" region = "us-east-1" assume_role { role_arn = var.state_role_arn } } }tests/main.tftest.hcl (2)
6-6: Consider making the test path more explicitThe path clearly indicates multi-instance testing, which is good. However, consider using a more descriptive directory name like
multi-instance-root-modulesto better reflect its purpose.
Line range hint
1-14: Add root_module_structure variable to test configurationFor completeness and explicit testing, consider adding the
root_module_structurevariable to match the test scenario:variables { root_modules_path = "./tests/fixtures/multi-instance" + root_module_structure = "MultiInstance" github_enterprise = { namespace = "masterpointio" } # ... rest of variables }tests/single-instance.tftest.hcl (2)
39-42: Strengthen the single instance validationThe current assertion only checks for length and presence. Consider adding more specific validation:
assert { - condition = length(local._root_module_yaml_decoded["root-module-a"]) == 1 && local._root_module_yaml_decoded["root-module-a"]["default"] != null + condition = ( + length(local._root_module_yaml_decoded["root-module-a"]) == 1 && + local._root_module_yaml_decoded["root-module-a"]["default"] != null && + !contains(keys(local._root_module_yaml_decoded["root-module-a"]), "test") + ) error_message = "_root_module_yaml_decoded is not a single instance: ${jsonencode(local._root_module_yaml_decoded)}" }
116-119: Add error details to before_init assertion messageConsider enhancing the error message to show which specific steps are missing:
assert { condition = contains(local.before_init["root-module-a"], "echo 'Hello'") && contains(local.before_init["root-module-a"], "echo 'World'") - error_message = "Before_init steps were not added to the stack: ${jsonencode(local.before_init)}" + error_message = "Missing required before_init steps. Expected 'echo Hello' and 'echo World'. Got: ${jsonencode(local.before_init["root-module-a"])}" }main.tf (2)
72-85: Consider adding type constraints for better code clarity.The implementation is solid, but consider adding type constraints to the local variables to make the expected data structure more explicit.
- _multi_instance_root_module_yaml_decoded = { + _multi_instance_root_module_yaml_decoded : map(map(any)) = {
242-244: LGTM! Consider enhancing tfvars documentation.The implementation correctly handles tfvars differently for each structure type. Consider adding a comment block above this section to explain the rationale.
+ # tfvars handling differs between MultiInstance and SingleInstance: + # - MultiInstance: Copies workspace-specific tfvars files + # - SingleInstance: Expects auto.tfvars in the root moduleREADME.md (3)
31-32: Consider adding migration guidance.The documentation clearly explains the MultiInstance structure, but consider adding guidance for users who might want to migrate between structures.
100-105: Enhance SingleInstance documentation with pros/cons.While the documentation warns against SingleInstance as less flexible, it would be helpful to explicitly list the pros and cons to help users make an informed decision.
188-189: Add link to code for settings reference.The documentation mentions "See the code for full details" - consider adding a direct link to the relevant section of the code or listing the most commonly used settings here.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (26)
.github/renovate.json5(1 hunks)README.md(5 hunks)examples/complete/components/spacelift-automation/main.tf(0 hunks)examples/complete/components/spacelift-automation/stacks/common.yaml(0 hunks)examples/complete/components/spacelift-automation/tfvars/example.tfvars(0 hunks)examples/complete/components/spacelift-automation/variables.tf(0 hunks)examples/single-instance/root-modules/random-pet/default.auto.tfvars(1 hunks)examples/single-instance/root-modules/random-pet/main.tf(1 hunks)examples/single-instance/root-modules/random-pet/stack.yaml(1 hunks)examples/single-instance/root-modules/random-pet/variables.tf(1 hunks)examples/single-instance/root-modules/random-pet/versions.tf(1 hunks)examples/single-instance/root-modules/rds-cluster-dev/main.tf(1 hunks)examples/single-instance/root-modules/rds-cluster-dev/stack.yaml(1 hunks)examples/single-instance/root-modules/rds-cluster-dev/versions.tf(1 hunks)examples/single-instance/root-modules/rds-cluster-prod/main.tf(1 hunks)examples/single-instance/root-modules/rds-cluster-prod/stack.yaml(1 hunks)examples/single-instance/root-modules/rds-cluster-prod/versions.tf(1 hunks)examples/single-instance/root-modules/spacelift-automation/backend.tf.json(1 hunks)examples/single-instance/root-modules/spacelift-automation/main.tf(1 hunks)examples/single-instance/root-modules/spacelift-automation/stack.yaml(1 hunks)examples/single-instance/root-modules/spacelift-automation/versions.tf(1 hunks)main.tf(6 hunks)tests/fixtures/single-instance/root-module-a/stack.yaml(1 hunks)tests/main.tftest.hcl(1 hunks)tests/single-instance.tftest.hcl(1 hunks)variables.tf(2 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (4)
- examples/complete/components/spacelift-automation/tfvars/example.tfvars
- examples/complete/components/spacelift-automation/variables.tf
- examples/complete/components/spacelift-automation/main.tf
- examples/complete/components/spacelift-automation/stacks/common.yaml
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (10)
- examples/single-instance/root-modules/rds-cluster-prod/stack.yaml
- examples/single-instance/root-modules/random-pet/default.auto.tfvars
- examples/single-instance/root-modules/rds-cluster-dev/stack.yaml
- examples/single-instance/root-modules/spacelift-automation/versions.tf
- examples/single-instance/root-modules/rds-cluster-prod/versions.tf
- examples/single-instance/root-modules/random-pet/versions.tf
- examples/single-instance/root-modules/rds-cluster-prod/main.tf
- examples/single-instance/root-modules/rds-cluster-dev/versions.tf
- examples/single-instance/root-modules/spacelift-automation/stack.yaml
- examples/single-instance/root-modules/rds-cluster-dev/main.tf
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (5)
examples/single-instance/root-modules/random-pet/variables.tf (1)
Pattern **/*.tf: You're a Terraform expert who has thoroughly studied all the documentation from Hashicorp https://developer.hashicorp.com/terraform/docs and OpenTofu https://opentofu.org/docs/.
You have a strong grasp of Terraform syntax and prioritize providing accurate and insightful code suggestions.
As a fan of the Cloud Posse / SweetOps ecosystem, you incorporate many of their best practices https://docs.cloudposse.com/best-practices/terraform/ while balancing them with general Terraform guidelines.
variables.tf (1)
Pattern **/*.tf: You're a Terraform expert who has thoroughly studied all the documentation from Hashicorp https://developer.hashicorp.com/terraform/docs and OpenTofu https://opentofu.org/docs/.
You have a strong grasp of Terraform syntax and prioritize providing accurate and insightful code suggestions.
As a fan of the Cloud Posse / SweetOps ecosystem, you incorporate many of their best practices https://docs.cloudposse.com/best-practices/terraform/ while balancing them with general Terraform guidelines.
examples/single-instance/root-modules/random-pet/main.tf (1)
Pattern **/*.tf: You're a Terraform expert who has thoroughly studied all the documentation from Hashicorp https://developer.hashicorp.com/terraform/docs and OpenTofu https://opentofu.org/docs/.
You have a strong grasp of Terraform syntax and prioritize providing accurate and insightful code suggestions.
As a fan of the Cloud Posse / SweetOps ecosystem, you incorporate many of their best practices https://docs.cloudposse.com/best-practices/terraform/ while balancing them with general Terraform guidelines.
examples/single-instance/root-modules/spacelift-automation/main.tf (1)
Pattern **/*.tf: You're a Terraform expert who has thoroughly studied all the documentation from Hashicorp https://developer.hashicorp.com/terraform/docs and OpenTofu https://opentofu.org/docs/.
You have a strong grasp of Terraform syntax and prioritize providing accurate and insightful code suggestions.
As a fan of the Cloud Posse / SweetOps ecosystem, you incorporate many of their best practices https://docs.cloudposse.com/best-practices/terraform/ while balancing them with general Terraform guidelines.
main.tf (1)
Pattern **/*.tf: You're a Terraform expert who has thoroughly studied all the documentation from Hashicorp https://developer.hashicorp.com/terraform/docs and OpenTofu https://opentofu.org/docs/.
You have a strong grasp of Terraform syntax and prioritize providing accurate and insightful code suggestions.
As a fan of the Cloud Posse / SweetOps ecosystem, you incorporate many of their best practices https://docs.cloudposse.com/best-practices/terraform/ while balancing them with general Terraform guidelines.
🔇 Additional comments (6)
.github/renovate.json5 (1)
11-15: Consider adding extra safety checks before auto-merging.
Currently, all minor, patch, pin, and digest updates will be merged automatically. While this can expedite dependency management, it might be prudent to introduce a layer of manual review (e.g., requiring at least one CI pass or successful test suite) to catch any unexpected downstream issues.
If you'd like to proceed with an automated test or security check prior to merging, let me know—I'm happy to recommend additional GitHub Actions or Renovate configuration tweaks!
variables.tf (2)
1-15: Well-structured variable definition with comprehensive documentation!
The root_module_structure variable is well-defined with clear documentation explaining both options and proper validation. The default value maintains backward compatibility.
272-272: LGTM: Improved clarity in description
The updated description better reflects that multiple stacks can be created in the specified space.
tests/single-instance.tftest.hcl (1)
1-130: Well-structured test suite with comprehensive coverage!
The test suite effectively validates single-instance specific behaviors including:
- Correct stack naming conventions
- Default workspace handling
- Project root path construction
- Label management
- Before init steps
The tests are well-organized and provide good coverage of the single-instance functionality.
main.tf (2)
28-45: LGTM! Clean implementation of root module structure handling.
The implementation elegantly handles both MultiInstance and SingleInstance structures using clear fileset patterns and conditional logic.
106-107: Verify impact on existing stacks' workspace handling.
The change to force default_tf_workspace_enabled = true for SingleInstance could affect state management if existing stacks are migrated to SingleInstance structure.
✅ Verification successful
Workspace handling changes are safe and well-tested
The codebase analysis shows this change is safe because:
- The behavior is explicitly documented in the README
- There are comprehensive tests covering both SingleInstance and MultiInstance workspace scenarios
- Existing stacks already use
default_tf_workspace_enabled: truein examples and test fixtures - The change aligns with the documented behavior where SingleInstance is meant to use a simpler configuration approach
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for existing stacks that might be affected by workspace changes
# Search for workspace configurations in stack files
rg -A 5 "terraform_workspace|default_tf_workspace_enabled"
# Search for workspace usage in Terraform files
ast-grep --pattern 'terraform {
$$$
workspace {
$$$
}
$$$
}'
Length of output: 10058
examples/single-instance/root-modules/spacelift-automation/main.tf
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
examples/single-instance/root-modules/spacelift-automation/backend.tf.json
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
examples/complete/components/spacelift-automation/main.tf(1 hunks)examples/complete/components/spacelift-automation/tfvars/example.tfvars(1 hunks)examples/single-instance/root-modules/spacelift-automation-example2/backend.tf.json(1 hunks)examples/single-instance/root-modules/spacelift-automation-example2/main.tf(1 hunks)examples/single-instance/root-modules/spacelift-automation-example2/stack.yaml(1 hunks)examples/single-instance/root-modules/spacelift-automation-example2/versions.tf(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- examples/single-instance/root-modules/spacelift-automation-example2/stack.yaml
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- examples/complete/components/spacelift-automation/main.tf
- examples/complete/components/spacelift-automation/tfvars/example.tfvars
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (2)
examples/single-instance/root-modules/spacelift-automation-example2/versions.tf (1)
Pattern **/*.tf: You're a Terraform expert who has thoroughly studied all the documentation from Hashicorp https://developer.hashicorp.com/terraform/docs and OpenTofu https://opentofu.org/docs/.
You have a strong grasp of Terraform syntax and prioritize providing accurate and insightful code suggestions.
As a fan of the Cloud Posse / SweetOps ecosystem, you incorporate many of their best practices https://docs.cloudposse.com/best-practices/terraform/ while balancing them with general Terraform guidelines.
examples/single-instance/root-modules/spacelift-automation-example2/main.tf (1)
Pattern **/*.tf: You're a Terraform expert who has thoroughly studied all the documentation from Hashicorp https://developer.hashicorp.com/terraform/docs and OpenTofu https://opentofu.org/docs/.
You have a strong grasp of Terraform syntax and prioritize providing accurate and insightful code suggestions.
As a fan of the Cloud Posse / SweetOps ecosystem, you incorporate many of their best practices https://docs.cloudposse.com/best-practices/terraform/ while balancing them with general Terraform guidelines.
📓 Learnings (1)
examples/single-instance/root-modules/spacelift-automation-example2/versions.tf (1)
Learnt from: gberenice
PR: masterpointio/terraform-spacelift-automation#3
File: modules/spacelift-automation/variables.tf:0-0
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T13:06:25.494Z
Learning: Spacelift requires a specific Terraform version number; it does not support version constraints like "~> 1.7.0".
🔇 Additional comments (1)
examples/single-instance/root-modules/spacelift-automation-example2/main.tf (1)
4-15: LGTM on module configuration structure
The module configuration correctly implements the single-instance root module structure with appropriate GitHub and path settings.
| required_version = "~> 1.0" | ||
|
|
||
| required_providers { | ||
| spacelift = { | ||
| source = "spacelift-io/spacelift" | ||
| version = "~> 1.14" | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Update version constraints to use specific versions
Based on Spacelift requirements, version constraints should use specific version numbers instead of ranges. This ensures consistent behavior across environments.
Apply this diff to fix the version constraints:
- required_version = "~> 1.0"
+ required_version = "1.5.7"
required_providers {
spacelift = {
source = "spacelift-io/spacelift"
- version = "~> 1.14"
+ version = "1.14.0"
}
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| required_version = "~> 1.0" | |
| required_providers { | |
| spacelift = { | |
| source = "spacelift-io/spacelift" | |
| version = "~> 1.14" | |
| } | |
| required_version = "1.5.7" | |
| required_providers { | |
| spacelift = { | |
| source = "spacelift-io/spacelift" | |
| version = "1.14.0" | |
| } |
| "workspace_key_prefix": "terraform-spacelift-automation", | ||
| "acl": "bucket-owner-full-control", | ||
| "bucket": "mp-automation-tfstate", | ||
| "dynamodb_table": "mp-automation-tfstate-lock", | ||
| "encrypt": true, | ||
| "key": "single-instance.tfstate", | ||
| "region": "us-east-1", | ||
| "assume_role": { | ||
| "role_arn": "arn:aws:iam::755965222190:role/mp-automation-tfstate" | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Parameterize backend configuration and protect sensitive data
The backend configuration contains hardcoded values and sensitive information that should be parameterized:
- AWS account ID and role ARN are visible in the repository
- Infrastructure component names (bucket, table) are hardcoded
Consider using a backend configuration template with variables:
{
"terraform": {
"backend": {
"s3": {
"workspace_key_prefix": "${workspace_prefix}",
"acl": "bucket-owner-full-control",
"bucket": "${state_bucket}",
"dynamodb_table": "${lock_table}",
"encrypt": true,
"key": "${state_key}",
"region": "${aws_region}",
"assume_role": {
"role_arn": "${backend_role_arn}"
}
}
}
}
}Then provide these values through a secure method like environment variables or a separate configuration file that's not committed to version control.
examples/single-instance/root-modules/spacelift-automation-example2/main.tf
Show resolved
Hide resolved
examples/single-instance/root-modules/spacelift-automation-example2/main.tf
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
tests/single-instance.tftest.hcl (3)
1-3: Consider making the API endpoint configurableThe API endpoint is currently hardcoded to Masterpoint's tenant. Consider making it configurable through a variable to improve reusability of these tests across different organizations.
provider "spacelift" { - api_key_endpoint = "https://masterpointio.app.spacelift.io" + api_key_endpoint = var.spacelift_api_endpoint }
5-18: Add variable descriptions and validationsConsider adding descriptions and validations for the variables to improve maintainability and prevent invalid inputs.
variable "root_modules_path" { description = "Path to the root modules directory" type = string validation { condition = can(regex("^[./]", var.root_modules_path)) error_message = "Root modules path must be a relative path starting with ./" } } variable "root_module_structure" { description = "The structure type for root modules (SingleInstance or MultiInstance)" type = string validation { condition = contains(["SingleInstance", "MultiInstance"], var.root_module_structure) error_message = "Root module structure must be either SingleInstance or MultiInstance" } }
20-134: Consider adding negative test casesThe test suite thoroughly covers the happy path but could benefit from negative test cases. Consider adding tests for:
- Invalid root module structure values
- Non-existent root modules path
- Malformed stack.yaml files
Example negative test:
run "test_invalid_root_module_structure" { command = plan expect_failures = [ { error_message = "Root module structure must be either SingleInstance or MultiInstance" } ] variables { root_module_structure = "InvalidStructure" } }
|
|
||
| module "spacelift-automation" { | ||
| source = "github.com/masterpointio/terraform-spacelift-automation" | ||
| version = "x.x.x" # Always pin a version, use the latest version from the release page. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The version argument in the module block is specified when when using modules installed from a registry. We should check the source to source = "masterpointio/automation/spacelift" or remove the version and update the source to include refs:
source = "github.com/masterpointio/terraform-spacelift-automation?ref=vX.X.X" # Always pin a version, use the latest version from the release page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Good callout. Let's change to registry syntax. Is this module in the registry? At this point, I think you're more experienced on this than I am...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yeah, I've published all our Spacelift modules to the registry: masterpointio/automation/spacelift
README.md
Outdated
|
|
||
| NOTE to Masterpoint team: We might want to create a small wrapper to automatize this using Taskit. On hold for now. | ||
| e.g. `tofu plan -var-file=tfvars/dev.tfvars` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This row looks lost. Was it supposed to end the last sentence?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Will fix via local change!
tests/single-instance.tftest.hcl
Outdated
| @@ -0,0 +1,134 @@ | |||
| provider "spacelift" { | |||
| api_key_endpoint = "https://masterpointio.app.spacelift.io" | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I'd move this to SPACELIFT_API_KEY_ENDPOINT secret env var.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yeah, you're right. Thanks for the callout.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Will do this as a follow up shortly ⌛
Co-authored-by: Veronika Gnilitska <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
main.tf (1)
45-52: Remove duplicated comment block.These lines appear to be a duplicate of the comment block above (lines 34-44).
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
README.md(5 hunks)main.tf(6 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
main.tf (1)
Pattern **/*.tf: You're a Terraform expert who has thoroughly studied all the documentation from Hashicorp https://developer.hashicorp.com/terraform/docs and OpenTofu https://opentofu.org/docs/.
You have a strong grasp of Terraform syntax and prioritize providing accurate and insightful code suggestions.
As a fan of the Cloud Posse / SweetOps ecosystem, you incorporate many of their best practices https://docs.cloudposse.com/best-practices/terraform/ while balancing them with general Terraform guidelines.
📓 Learnings (1)
README.md (2)
Learnt from: Gowiem
PR: masterpointio/terraform-spacelift-automation#17
File: examples/single-instance/root-modules/spacelift-automation-example2/main.tf:11-12
Timestamp: 2024-12-23T04:16:47.209Z
Learning: For single-instance Spacelift automation structures, the user prefers to hardcode AWS integration ID and related settings rather than parameterizing them.
Learnt from: Gowiem
PR: masterpointio/terraform-spacelift-automation#17
File: examples/single-instance/root-modules/spacelift-automation-example2/main.tf:2-2
Timestamp: 2024-12-23T04:17:28.637Z
Learning: For local development and testing, Gowiem prefers using relative module paths over pinned Git references in example files.
🔇 Additional comments (8)
main.tf (5)
28-55: LGTM! Clean implementation of the root module structure logic.
The implementation elegantly handles both MultiInstance and SingleInstance structures using the fileset function with appropriate path patterns.
82-95: LGTM! Well-structured YAML decoding implementation.
The separation of MultiInstance and SingleInstance YAML decoding with clear data structure examples in comments makes the code easy to understand and maintain.
116-117: LGTM! Clear default workspace handling.
The logic correctly enforces default workspace for SingleInstance structure while maintaining flexibility for MultiInstance.
252-254: LGTM! Clear tfvars handling logic.
The implementation correctly differentiates between MultiInstance (using tfvars files) and SingleInstance (expecting auto.tfvars) structures.
227-227: LGTM! Clear folder label generation.
The conditional expression correctly generates appropriate folder labels for both MultiInstance and SingleInstance structures.
README.md (3)
Line range hint 9-27: LGTM! Clear and comprehensive documentation.
The overview and usage sections effectively explain the module's purpose and introduce the concept of different root module structures.
Line range hint 31-194: LGTM! Excellent structure documentation.
The documentation provides clear, detailed explanations of both MultiInstance and SingleInstance structures, with helpful examples and requirements. The tfvars handling explanation is particularly well-done.
141-194: LGTM! Helpful FAQ section.
The FAQ section effectively addresses common questions and provides clear guidance, particularly regarding self-management and tfvars handling.
…at/structure-modes-take1
…/terraform-spacelift-automation into feat/structure-modes-take1
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
.github/workflows/tf-test.yaml (1)
Line range hint
25-27: Consider pinning Terraform/OpenTofu versions in the matrixWhile the current setup tests against both Terraform and OpenTofu, it might be beneficial to test against specific versions to ensure compatibility across different releases.
Example enhancement:
strategy: matrix: - tf: [tofu, terraform] + include: + - tf: tofu + version: "1.6.0" + - tf: terraform + version: "1.6.0"tests/single-instance.tftest.hcl (3)
1-14: Add documentation for test variablesConsider adding comments to document the purpose and expected values of each variable, especially
root_module_structurewhich is a key configuration for this test suite.
16-24: Enhance root module fileset test coverageConsider adding assertions to verify:
- The exact number of root modules expected
- That invalid or hidden directories are not included
112-130: Document external test dependenciesThe before_init test expects
echo 'World'which comes from the stack configuration. Consider adding a comment to explain this dependency for better test maintainability.# Test that the before_init steps are added to the stack +# Note: 'echo World' command comes from the stack.yaml configuration run "test_single_instance_before_init_steps_are_added_to_stack" {
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
.github/workflows/tf-test.yaml(1 hunks)README.md(5 hunks)tests/main.tftest.hcl(1 hunks)tests/single-instance.tftest.hcl(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- tests/main.tftest.hcl
- README.md
🔇 Additional comments (4)
.github/workflows/tf-test.yaml (2)
10-12: LGTM! Environment variables are properly configured.
The new SPACELIFT_API_KEY_ENDPOINT secret is correctly added and follows the existing pattern for Spacelift API credentials management. All sensitive values are appropriately sourced from GitHub secrets.
Line range hint 31-37: LGTM! Proper caching strategy for Aqua.
The cache configuration is well-structured with:
- Appropriate cache key versioning
- Conditional execution to skip during local testing with
act - Proper restore-keys fallback
tests/single-instance.tftest.hcl (2)
26-70: Well-structured stack configuration tests!
The tests thoroughly validate stack naming, workspace settings, and project root configuration. Good job on breaking these into focused test cases.
72-110: Comprehensive label validation tests!
Good separation of concerns with individual tests for each label type. The assertions clearly validate both presence and absence of labels as needed.
| "project_root" = replace(format("%s/%s", var.root_modules_path, module), "../", "") | ||
| "root_module" = module, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I can take this on or we can do it in another PR: The thing I would say about the project_root is that there are certain times where it's needed to customize the "project root". I put that in quotes because if specified, it only pulls the said directory in this case. e.g. the example only pulls the directory examples/complete/components/random-pet
But for certain tools like Terraspace, where the entire root of the whole repository is needed for base templates and configs and others, this project_root logic wouldn't work here since it only pulls that said directory at runtime.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I would think to put it in a try with content. project_root to let it be passed in.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@oycyc let's follow up with support for this 👍
| assert { | ||
| condition = local._root_module_stack_configs["root-module-a"].project_root == "${var.root_modules_path}/root-module-a" | ||
| error_message = "project_root is not correct for root-module-a: ${jsonencode(local._root_module_stack_configs)}" | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
These tests are awesome! But yeah a way to specify the project_root is needed.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The tests will help with implementing!!!
🤖 I have created a release *beep* *boop* --- ## [0.4.0](v0.3.1...v0.4.0) (2024-12-26) ### Features * begins the work to support single vs multi root_module_structure ([#17](#17)) ([598f0c7](598f0c7)) --- This PR was generated with [Release Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See [documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please). Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Matt Gowie <[email protected]>
what
MultiInstancevsSingleInstanceroot module structures.why
references
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation
Chores