Add FAQ entry: navigate outside component
#390
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
|
Review or Edit in CodeSandboxOpen the branch in Web Editor • VS Code • Insiders |
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #390 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 100.00% 100.00%
=========================================
Files 6 6
Lines 226 226
Branches 56 56
=========================================
Hits 226 226 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
|
Thank you!
This is def not intentional, could you push these changes as well so I can take a look? |
molefrog
approved these changes
Dec 8, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
As mentioned in #59 .
Btw, for me some VSCode extension (probably Markdown All in One) tries to update the table of contents to match the titles of the sections. I reverted these changes for now, but: is it intentional that they don't match?