FedCM Update

[bvandersloot-mozilla]

It's been a couple years. This should be a good update.

@martinthomson is a good person to review and merge!

[tantek]

I checked the linked issue #618 and didn't see any discussion regarding the change in position from "positive" to "neutral". Could you add a comment there with the updated analysis (or link if elsewhere) that led to the new "neutral" position?

[bvandersloot-mozilla]

@tantek: I've added a comment with some updated analysis in #618. I also updated the URL so it doesn't rely on a redirect. It recently published a FPWD in a WG, but has a lot of issues to close before it becomes a CR. Should I leave the org as "Proposal" or update to "W3C"?

[tantek]

yes, change org to W3C, and similarly, if you could update the mozPositionDetail with a summary of the comment you made on #618 that would help provide a self-contained update of why we are changing the position to "neutral". Otherwise from an outside perspective it's not obvious (without hunting/clicking) why position changed.

[zcorpan]

I've rebased this so that it edits activities.yml instead, and added "W3C" per @tantek 's comment. I haven't changed the rationale as @tantek requested, leaving that to @bvandersloot-mozilla

[bvandersloot-mozilla]

I have already updated rationale with a summary of that comment. mozPositionDetail got refactored to that IIRC.

[tantek]

LGTM. Thanks for this critical update.