Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Native neo4j datetime; increase test coverage in properties.py #811

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Jun 7, 2024

Conversation

mariusconjeaud
Copy link
Collaborator

See #530

@mariusconjeaud mariusconjeaud added this to the 5.3.2 milestone Jun 7, 2024
@mariusconjeaud mariusconjeaud self-assigned this Jun 7, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 7, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 92.00%. Comparing base (7c6662a) to head (0bfc4e3).

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##           rc/5.3.2     #811      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     91.47%   92.00%   +0.53%     
============================================
  Files            34       34              
  Lines          4574     4590      +16     
============================================
+ Hits           4184     4223      +39     
+ Misses          390      367      -23     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@mariusconjeaud mariusconjeaud changed the title Native neo4j datetime Native neo4j datetime; increase test coverage in properties.py Jun 7, 2024
@mariusconjeaud mariusconjeaud merged commit 0a03833 into rc/5.3.2 Jun 7, 2024
29 of 30 checks passed
@mariusconjeaud mariusconjeaud deleted the native_neo4j_datetime branch June 7, 2024 15:01
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Jun 7, 2024

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants