add porechop module

[ggabernet]

Added missing porechop module by the Golden Delicious 🍏 team

PR checklist

Closes #827

• This comment contains a description of changes (with reason).
• If you've fixed a bug or added code that should be tested, add tests!
• If you've added a new tool - have you followed the module conventions in the contribution docs
• If necessary, include test data in your PR.
• Remove all TODO statements.
• Emit the versions.yml file.
• Follow the naming conventions.
• Follow the parameters requirements.
• Follow the input/output options guidelines.
• Add a resource label
• Use BioConda and BioContainers if possible to fulfil software requirements.
• Ensure that the test works with either Docker / Singularity. Conda CI tests can be quite flaky:
  • PROFILE=docker pytest --tag <MODULE> --symlink --keep-workflow-wd
  • PROFILE=singularity pytest --tag <MODULE> --symlink --keep-workflow-wd
  • PROFILE=conda pytest --tag <MODULE> --symlink --keep-workflow-wd

[ggabernet]

HI our module successfully passes tests for docker and singularity, however the md5 checksums don't pass for conda, as we are getting different checksums in different systems (e.g. github actions vs locally).

[FriederikeHanssen]

LGTM, the conda thing is annoying, it works for docker & singularity with the checksums, right? I think we can just merge then anyways.

[rpetit3]

Great work! I just have some super minor suggestions.

I think the github repo links work better then the anaconda ones since they have more info. But I'm really interested to get your thoughts on _porechop vs $options.suffix

Cheers

[ggabernet]

Thanks for your reviews @rpetit3 and @FriederikeHanssen I've included all your review comments