Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: ServerConfig cannot be found when the component is unmounted #236

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 29, 2024

Conversation

hacke2
Copy link
Member

@hacke2 hacke2 commented Nov 27, 2024

Types

  • 🐛 Bug Fixes

Background or solution

image

ChangeLog

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • 新功能
    • 改进了日志服务管理器的配置处理,增强了错误处理能力。

@hacke2 hacke2 requested a review from wangxiaojuan November 27, 2024 09:04
@opensumi opensumi bot added the 🐞 bug label Nov 27, 2024
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 27, 2024

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

在此次更改中,log-manager.ts 文件中的 LogServiceManager 类进行了修改,主要集中在 serverConfig 属性的处理上。serverConfig 属性已从非可选类型更改为可选类型,以解决在卸载过程中可能导致 serverConfig 被过早销毁的定时问题。构造函数和 init 方法也进行了更新,以安全地使用可选链访问 serverConfig 的属性。

Changes

文件路径 更改摘要
packages/sumi-core/src/server/logs-core/log-manager.ts serverConfig 属性类型从非可选更改为可选,并更新构造函数和 init 方法以使用可选链安全访问 logDirlogLevelLogServiceClass 属性。

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant LogServiceManager
    participant ServerConfig

    User->>LogServiceManager: 创建实例
    LogServiceManager->>ServerConfig: 初始化配置
    alt serverConfig 可用
        LogServiceManager->>LogServiceManager: 访问 this.serverConfig?.logDir
        LogServiceManager->>LogServiceManager: 访问 this.serverConfig?.logLevel
        LogServiceManager->>LogServiceManager: 访问 this.serverConfig?.LogServiceClass
    else serverConfig 不可用
        LogServiceManager->>LogServiceManager: 处理未定义情况
    end
Loading

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
packages/sumi-core/src/server/logs-core/log-manager.ts (1)

29-30: 建议为 logDir 和 logLevel 添加默认值

虽然使用可选链操作符很好地处理了 serverConfig 可能为 undefined 的情况,但建议为这些关键配置提供默认值,以确保日志服务在任何情况下都能正常运行。

例如:

- logDir: this.serverConfig?.logDir,
- logLevel: this.serverConfig?.logLevel,
+ logDir: this.serverConfig?.logDir ?? DEFAULT_LOG_FOLDER,
+ logLevel: this.serverConfig?.logLevel ?? LogLevel.Info,
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 62fa270 and 11950fb.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • packages/sumi-core/src/server/logs-core/log-manager.ts (3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
packages/sumi-core/src/server/logs-core/log-manager.ts (3)

17-18: 修改类型定义解决组件卸载时的时序问题,代码变更合理

serverConfig 修改为可选属性是解决组件卸载时序问题的合适方案。注释清晰地解释了这个改动的原因。


39-39: LogServiceClass 的处理方式值得肯定

使用可选链配合默认值的方式(this.serverConfig?.LogServiceClass || LogService)是很好的实践,确保了即使在 serverConfig 未定义的情况下也能正常工作。


Line range hint 17-39: 建议验证相关代码的完整性

虽然当前的修改解决了组件卸载时的问题,但建议进行以下验证:

✅ Verification successful

Let me gather more information about the initialization and usage of serverConfig.


Let me check the initialization flow and error handling in more detail.


代码修改验证完成,建议可以合并

根据验证结果,当前对 serverConfig 的可选性处理是合理的:

  • serverConfig 在初始化时提供了合理的默认值(DEFAULT_LOG_FOLDERLogLevel.Info
  • 错误处理逻辑完善,包含了必要的初始化检查
  • 其他使用 ServerConfig 的服务都有正确的依赖注入处理
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# 检查是否有其他地方使用了 serverConfig,确保所有使用点都正确处理了可选性
rg "serverConfig\." packages/sumi-core/src/server/logs-core/

# 检查是否有相关的错误处理代码
rg -A 3 "catch|throw|error" packages/sumi-core/src/server/logs-core/

Length of output: 2093


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# 检查 LogManager 类的完整实现,了解 serverConfig 的初始化和使用
ast-grep --pattern 'class LogManager {
  $$$
}'

# 检查是否有其他文件引用了 LogManager
rg "LogManager" packages/sumi-core/src/server/

Length of output: 211


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# 检查 LogManager 的初始化方法和相关配置
ast-grep --pattern 'init($$$) {
  $$$
}'

# 检查 ServerConfig 的定义和使用
rg "ServerConfig" packages/sumi-core/src/server/

# 检查日志相关的错误处理
rg "throw|catch" packages/sumi-core/src/server/logs-core/

Length of output: 2023

@hacke2 hacke2 merged commit 4a12e25 into main Nov 29, 2024
5 checks passed
@hacke2 hacke2 deleted the fix/dispose-log-error branch November 29, 2024 09:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants