-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore: update licenses #149
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -13,6 +13,8 @@ ALLOWED_LICENSES=( | |
'Apache-2.0' | ||
'Apache License, Version 2.0' | ||
'Apache*' | ||
'Artistic-2.0' | ||
'BlueOak-1.0.0' | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. It seems like this is fine, because it is intended as an easier to read alternative to MIT: https://blueoakcouncil.org/license/1.0.0 And looking at the dependencies, it looks like it would be pretty hard to remove the affected packages. |
||
'BSD' | ||
'BSD*' | ||
'BSD-2-Clause' | ||
|
@@ -25,9 +27,12 @@ ALLOWED_LICENSES=( | |
'CC-BY-4.0' | ||
'(CC-BY-4.0 AND MIT)' | ||
'ISC' | ||
'ISC*' | ||
'LGPL-2.1' # LGPL allows commercial use, requires only that modifications to LGPL-protected libraries are published under a GPL-compatible license | ||
'MIT' | ||
'MIT*' | ||
'MIT-0' | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Removes attribution from MIT: https://github.com/aws/mit-0 |
||
'MIT AND ISC' | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Since both MIT and ISC are fine, these should be fine, too. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Jonas did the work. I just quickly reviewed the licenses, and it looks good. |
||
'(MIT AND BSD-3-Clause)' | ||
'(MIT AND Zlib)' | ||
'(MIT OR Apache-2.0)' | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Seems like this is used by
npm
already, which we obviously use and also distribute (via docker images) extensively, so this should be fine.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artistic_License