Added test result to GH Annotations #4036
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
4 Skipped Deployments
|
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces modifications to several end-to-end test files in the Changes
Sequence DiagramsequenceDiagram
participant Test as Test Case
participant Core as @actions/core
participant Logger as Logging System
Test->>Core: Encounter test failure
Core->>Logger: Log notice using core.notice()
Note over Core,Logger: Replaces direct environment variable assignment
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
✨ Finishing Touches
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
packages/e2e/tests/swap.osmo.wallet.spec.ts (1)
Add documentation for the skipped OSMO to WBTC swap test
The test is explicitly skipped using
test.skip()without explanation, while other WBTC-related tests in the codebase are active. Since WBTC functionality appears to work in other scenarios (pair selection, balance checking), it would be helpful to document the specific reason for skipping this swap test.🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
57-67: Consider documenting why the WBTC test is skipped.The test for OSMO to WBTC swap is skipped without explanation. Consider adding a comment explaining why it's skipped or create an issue to track its re-enablement.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if there's an existing issue about the skipped test gh issue list --search "WBTC test skip"Length of output: 130
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Get the full content of the test file and surrounding context cat packages/e2e/tests/swap.osmo.wallet.spec.ts # Search for any WBTC-related comments or documentation rg -i "wbtc" packages/e2e/tests/ -A 5 -B 5Length of output: 6433
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
packages/e2e/tests/swap.usdc.wallet.spec.ts (2)
1-7: Consider maintaining existing quote style.While the functional changes are good, changing from single to double quotes seems unnecessary and might conflict with project conventions.
-import * as core from "@actions/core"; -import { type BrowserContext, chromium, expect, test } from "@playwright/test"; -import { TestConfig } from "../test-config"; -import { UnzipExtension } from "../unzip-extension"; -import { WalletPage } from "../pages/keplr-page"; -import { TradePage } from "../pages/trade-page"; +import * as core from '@actions/core' +import { type BrowserContext, chromium, expect, test } from '@playwright/test' +import { TestConfig } from '../test-config' +import { UnzipExtension } from '../unzip-extension' +import { WalletPage } from '../pages/keplr-page' +import { TradePage } from '../pages/trade-page'
9-166: Consider maintaining consistent quote and semicolon style.While the functional changes are good, the widespread style changes from single to double quotes and adding semicolons might make the diff harder to review and could conflict with project conventions.
Let me know if you'd like me to generate a diff to revert these style changes while keeping the functional changes.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
packages/e2e/keplr-extension-manifest-v3-v0.12.177.zipis excluded by!**/*.zip,!**/*.zip
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
packages/e2e/tests/monitoring.swap.wallet.spec.ts(2 hunks)packages/e2e/tests/swap.osmo.wallet.spec.ts(2 hunks)packages/e2e/tests/swap.usdc.wallet.spec.ts(1 hunks)packages/e2e/unzip-extension.ts(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- packages/e2e/unzip-extension.ts
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (20)
- GitHub Check: test (20.x, unit)
- GitHub Check: test (20.x, proto-codecs)
- GitHub Check: test (20.x, tx)
- GitHub Check: test (20.x, bridge)
- GitHub Check: test (20.x, bridge)
- GitHub Check: test (20.x, math)
- GitHub Check: test (20.x, math)
- GitHub Check: test (20.x, pools)
- GitHub Check: test (20.x, pools)
- GitHub Check: test (20.x, stores)
- GitHub Check: test (20.x, stores)
- GitHub Check: test (20.x, server)
- GitHub Check: test (20.x, server)
- GitHub Check: test (20.x, utils)
- GitHub Check: test (20.x, utils)
- GitHub Check: test (20.x, web)
- GitHub Check: wait-for-deployment
- GitHub Check: test (20.x, web)
- GitHub Check: lint-workspace
- GitHub Check: Summary
🔇 Additional comments (5)
packages/e2e/tests/monitoring.swap.wallet.spec.ts (2)
1-1: LGTM! Import of@actions/corefor GitHub Annotations.The addition of
@actions/corealigns with the PR objective to integrate test results with GitHub Annotations.
44-51: LGTM! Well-structured test status logging.The
afterEachhook effectively captures and reports test failures using GitHub Annotations. The implementation:
- Logs test status to console for debugging
- Reports failures through GitHub Annotations using
core.notice()packages/e2e/tests/swap.osmo.wallet.spec.ts (2)
1-1: LGTM! Consistent import of@actions/core.The addition maintains consistency with other test files.
47-54: LGTM! Consistent test status logging implementation.The
afterEachhook matches the implementation in other test files, maintaining consistency across the test suite.packages/e2e/tests/swap.usdc.wallet.spec.ts (1)
55-62: LGTM! Consistent test status logging implementation.The
afterEachhook maintains consistency with other test files in reporting test status to GitHub Annotations.
What is the purpose of the change: