refactor: Upgrade ldapjs from 2.3.3 to 3.0.2

[onurhanife]

Pull Request

• Report security issues confidentially.
• Any contribution is under this license.
• Link this pull request to an issue.

Issue

Closes: #8592

Approach

#8623 cloned, merged to alpha and conflicts are fixed

Tasks

• Add tests
• Add changes to documentation (guides, repository pages, code comments)
• Add security check
• Add new Parse Error codes to Parse JS SDK

[parse-github-assistant]

Thanks for opening this pull request!

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 88.23529% with 2 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 94.19%. Comparing base (ac7399b) to head (f933b56).
Report is 5 commits behind head on alpha.

❗ Current head f933b56 differs from pull request most recent head 39cd931. Consider uploading reports for the commit 39cd931 to get more accurate results

Files	Patch %	Lines
src/Adapters/Cache/RedisCacheAdapter.js	50.00%	1 Missing ⚠️
src/cli/utils/runner.js	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##            alpha    #8891      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   94.20%   94.19%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         186      186              
  Lines       14797    14802       +5     
==========================================
+ Hits        13939    13943       +4     
- Misses        858      859       +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[mtrezza]

There seems to be a conflict again, after I've merged some of the open PRs. Could you please resolve them, so we can merge this? Thanks

[onurhanife]

@mtrezza i resolved conflicts but there some new tests that you wrote about ignoreEmailVerification and page routing tests related to emailVerifications are fails. FYI

[mtrezza]

Which tests are you referring to? They all seem to pass except for some flaky tests.

[mtrezza]

@onurhanife This PR also contains quite a few code style changes. Not sure where they come from, but could you please make sure they are not included in the PR? The PR should only contain the changes that are necessary for the fix.

[onurhanife]

@mtrezza My prettiers require config file option enabled, and I prefer using double quotes in my Prettier configurations. However, I'm not sure where these style changes are coming from. I also noticed that the .prettierrc file is not in JSON format, which might be why it's not working correctly. Is it intentionally like this, or I can fix it with this PR?

[mtrezza]

The code style changes I see in this PR make sense, but they shouldn't be in this PR. If easily possible, could you revert them and only keep the necessary changes? I believe it's just 1 code line that is required, and the package upgrade. It may be easier to just create a new PR?

[mtrezza]

It seems something went wrong here. I suggest to either revert all changes by just replacing the files, or open a new PR.

[mtrezza]

Closing via #8947

[mtrezza]

@onurhanife Kindly see #8947; the PR was simple and required just 1 line of code, when removing the code style changes.

[onurhanife]

@mtrezza I was aware that we could handle it this simply, I just hadn't had the chance to focus on this side yet, but I see that you've resolved the issue in my place. Thank you.