-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update/locidex #96
Update/locidex #96
Conversation
|
Perhaps the relevant fields should be sub set out
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This looks amazing Matthew 😃 I really delved in and learned a lot reviewing it! Thanks for that!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fantastic work, Matthew! Your detailed comments throughout the code are really appreciated—they make everything so much easier to follow. I found your updates in locidex_search.nf
particularly impressive, and the explanations really clarify the changes. Thanks for taking the time to document everything so thoroughly!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks so much for your amazing work Matthew. I still have to continue on with some testing, but I have some initial feedback for you below 😄
Thank you Aaron!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks so much for your amazing work @mattheww95. And for the time you spend testing/providing feedback @kylacochrane 😄
I have marked as resolved most of the comments I had previously Matthew (thanks) or replied to some of them for additional changes/information.
I did have a few more comments for you as well.
Also, I do have some questions about how passing an allele_scheme will now work in IRIDA Next, but I think that should be a discussion we have.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Everything looks good to me. Thanks so much Matthew 😄
If all you needed to fix for the tests to pass is to set terminate for one process in the test case, then you can do that and then merge the PR.
Draft PR to verify existing unit tests still run.