Test with Executorlib #38
Conversation
WalkthroughA new test method, Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- tests/test_conda_function.py (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
tests/test_conda_function.py (1)
6-6: LGTM: New import statement is correctly placed and necessary.The import of
Executorfromexecutorlibis correctly placed within the try-except block, which is good for error handling. This import is necessary for the new test methodtest_conda_function_with_executorlib.
| def test_conda_function_with_executorlib(self): | ||
| cloudpickle_register(ind=1) | ||
| with Executor(max_cores=1, backend="local", hostname_localhost=True) as exe: | ||
| future = exe.submit(add_function, 1, 2) | ||
| number, prefix = future.result() | ||
| self.assertEqual(prefix[-5:], "py312") | ||
| self.assertEqual(number, 3) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider enhancing the executor test for more comprehensive coverage.
The new test method test_conda_function_with_executorlib is a good addition to verify the functionality with executorlib. However, consider the following suggestions to make it more robust:
-
Test with multiple cores: Instead of
max_cores=1, consider testing with multiple cores to ensure the function works correctly in a multi-core environment. -
Test with different backends: The current test uses
backend="local". Consider parameterizing the test to run with different backends if applicable. -
Add error handling and timeout: Implement a timeout for
future.result()to prevent the test from hanging indefinitely. Also, consider adding error handling to check for specific exceptions that might be thrown by the executor. -
Test concurrency: If relevant, consider submitting multiple functions concurrently to test the executor's ability to handle parallel executions.
Here's an example of how you might implement these suggestions:
import pytest
from concurrent.futures import TimeoutError
@pytest.mark.parametrize("max_cores,backend", [(1, "local"), (2, "local"), (1, "remote")])
def test_conda_function_with_executorlib(self, max_cores, backend):
cloudpickle_register(ind=1)
with Executor(max_cores=max_cores, backend=backend, hostname_localhost=True) as exe:
future1 = exe.submit(add_function, 1, 2)
future2 = exe.submit(add_function, 3, 4)
try:
number1, prefix1 = future1.result(timeout=10)
number2, prefix2 = future2.result(timeout=10)
except TimeoutError:
self.fail("Executor timed out")
self.assertEqual(prefix1[-5:], "py312")
self.assertEqual(prefix2[-5:], "py312")
self.assertEqual(number1, 3)
self.assertEqual(number2, 7)This enhanced version tests multiple scenarios and provides better error handling and timeout management.
Summary by CodeRabbit
add_functionusing theExecutorclass, validating output and correctness.