You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Standardize instruction wording to maintain consistency throughout the documentation
The new instruction about backticks has inconsistent wording compared to the old one. The example should be consistent with the instruction. Consider standardizing the wording to avoid confusion.
-- When mentioning code elements (variables, names, or files) in your response, surround them with backticks (`). For example: "verify that `user_id` is..."+- When mentioning code elements (variables, names, or files) in your response, surround them with backticks (`). For example: "ensure that `user_id` is..."
Apply this suggestion
Suggestion importance[1-10]: 3
Why: The suggestion correctly identifies a minor inconsistency in wording ("verify" vs "ensure"), but this has minimal impact on functionality or understanding of the instructions.
3
Author self-review: I have reviewed the PR code suggestions, and addressed the relevant ones.
Use a more descriptive variable name for the date field
Consider using a more descriptive variable name than date for the datetime string. Since this is used in the PR context, a name like pr_review_date or analysis_date would better convey its purpose and usage.
Why: The suggestion directly addresses the criteria of meaningful variable names, proposing a more descriptive name that better reflects the variable's purpose in the PR context.
10
Possible issue
Add timezone specification to datetime.now() call
The datetime.now() call without a timezone specification might lead to inconsistencies across different environments. Consider using datetime.now(timezone.utc) to ensure consistent timezone handling across different systems.
Why: The suggestion identifies an important edge case where timezone differences could cause inconsistencies, which aligns with the criteria of looking for edge cases in new functions.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
User description
aaa
PR Type
Enhancement
Description
Added a new
date
field to the code suggestions context.Updated prompts to avoid package-related suggestions and improve clarity.
Refined guidelines for code suggestions to focus on visible changes.
Changes walkthrough 📝
pr_code_suggestions.py
Add `date` field to code suggestions context
pr_agent/tools/pr_code_suggestions.py
date
field to the context dictionary.datetime.now
to format the current date.pr_code_suggestions_prompts.toml
Refine prompts to avoid package-related suggestions
pr_agent/settings/pr_code_suggestions_prompts.toml