refactor: simplify review effort label format and remove maximal effo…

[mrT23]

User description

…rt limit

---

PR Type

Enhancement, Documentation

---

Description

• Simplified the review effort label format.

• Removed the maximal review effort limit logic.

• Updated documentation to reflect the removal of maximal review effort.

• Adjusted configuration file by removing maximal_review_effort.

---

Changes walkthrough 📝

	Relevant files
Enhancement	pr_reviewer.py Simplified review effort label and removed limit logic      pr_agent/tools/pr_reviewer.py Updated review effort label format to Review effort: X/5. Removed logic related to maximal review effort limit. Adjusted label filtering to match new format. +2/-16
Documentation	review.md Updated documentation to remove maximal review effort references docs/docs/tools/review.md Removed documentation for maximal_review_effort setting. Updated usage tips to exclude references to maximal review effort. +0/-10
Configuration changes	configuration.toml Removed `maximal_review_effort` from configuration              pr_agent/settings/configuration.toml Removed maximal_review_effort configuration setting. +0/-1

---

Need help?

Type /help how to ... in the comments thread for any question about Qodo Merge usage.

Check out the documentation for more information.

[qodo-merge-pro-for-open-source]

PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

(Review updated until commit c1fa22d)

Here are some key observations to aid the review process:

⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 2 🔵🔵⚪⚪⚪

🧪 No relevant tests

🔒 No security concerns identified

⚡ Recommended focus areas for review Possible Issue The new logic for filtering labels (current_labels_filtered) may inadvertently remove labels that are not strictly related to 'review effort' or 'possible security concern' due to the use of startswith. Ensure this logic is precise and does not unintentionally filter out unrelated labels. current_labels_filtered = [label for label in current_labels if not label.lower().startswith('review effort:') and not label.lower().startswith( 'possible security concern')]

[qodo-merge-pro-for-open-source]

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Explore these optional code suggestions:

Category	Suggestion	Score
Possible issue	Add error handling for labels Add error handling for the case when label filtering fails due to malformed label strings, preventing potential crashes during label processing. pr_agent/tools/pr_reviewer.py [386-388] -current_labels_filtered = [label for label in current_labels if - not label.lower().startswith('review effort:') and not label.lower().startswith( - 'possible security concern')] +current_labels_filtered = [] +for label in current_labels: + try: + if not (label.lower().startswith('review effort:') or + label.lower().startswith('possible security concern')): + current_labels_filtered.append(label) + except AttributeError: + get_logger().warning(f"Skipping invalid label format: {label}") Apply this suggestion Suggestion importance[1-10]: 5 Why: The suggestion adds defensive programming by handling potential AttributeError exceptions when processing labels. While the current code is likely safe in practice, the error handling would make it more robust against malformed label data.	5
General	Add input validation for labels Add input validation for the review effort label format to ensure it matches the expected pattern 'Review effort: X/5'. This prevents potential issues with malformed labels. pr_agent/tools/pr_reviewer.py [374] -review_labels.append(f'Review effort: {estimated_effort_number}/5') +if str(estimated_effort_number).isdigit(): + review_labels.append(f'Review effort: {estimated_effort_number}/5') +else: + get_logger().warning(f"Invalid review effort format: {estimated_effort_number}") Apply this suggestion Suggestion importance[1-10]: 3 Why: The suggestion adds redundant validation since the code already checks if estimated_effort_number is an integer and within range 1-5. The existing validation in lines 369-373 is sufficient.	3

[mrT23]

Persistent review updated to latest commit c1fa22d

[mrT23]

Persistent review updated to latest commit c1fa22d