Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Server-side Pagination: Tidy up settings #13089

Open
Tracked by #8527
richard-cox opened this issue Jan 14, 2025 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #13159
Open
Tracked by #8527

Server-side Pagination: Tidy up settings #13089

richard-cox opened this issue Jan 14, 2025 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #13159
Assignees
Labels
area/performance area/server-side-pagination kind/enhancement QA/dev-automation Issues that engineers have written automation around so QA doesn't have look at this size/2 Size Estimate 2
Milestone

Comments

@richard-cox
Copy link
Member

richard-cox commented Jan 14, 2025

  • Ensure mechanism for settings is ready for release aka easily up-gradable
@richard-cox richard-cox added this to the v2.11.0 milestone Jan 14, 2025
@richard-cox richard-cox added the size/2 Size Estimate 2 label Jan 14, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot added QA/dev-automation Issues that engineers have written automation around so QA doesn't have look at this and removed size/2 Size Estimate 2 labels Jan 14, 2025
@richard-cox richard-cox added the size/2 Size Estimate 2 label Jan 20, 2025
@richard-cox richard-cox changed the title Server-side Pagination: Tidy up settings, enable by default Server-side Pagination: Tidy up settings Jan 20, 2025
@richard-cox richard-cox linked a pull request Jan 20, 2025 that will close this issue
7 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/performance area/server-side-pagination kind/enhancement QA/dev-automation Issues that engineers have written automation around so QA doesn't have look at this size/2 Size Estimate 2
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant