-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ddid fixes #79
ddid fixes #79
Conversation
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
added the computing meta fix you did @sjperkins The real test with MS from @IanHeywood |
ok to test |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good to me thanks
Feel free to post before and after plots of the VLA data here for discussion |
I'm not sure if this is possible! #77 is caused by is caused by two wrongs making a right for MeerKAT data, but failing on other multi-SPW datasets. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good to me, just need to remove commented out code.
Thankfully @IanHeywood was intrepid enough to try it on something with interesting SPW's. |
Not sure I follow. One of the datasets has all the original DDIDs but no rows in the MS aside from one. The other has only one SPW and associated rows. Either way it should now be able to flag multiple SPW. Could we plot data without flags (add the flags in casa plotms, should display in red) and with flags, just to be sure it does something logical here? |
Ah I see. To reiterate: MeerKAT data only has a single SPW and the code prior to this code only worked for a single SPW. @IanHeywood tried it on an MS with multiple SPW's, exposing the logic error. Thus, I didn't think it would be possible to get "before the bug" plots. However, I understand that you're asking for plots with and without flagging for the VLA MS on this branch? Got a handy shadems command for @smasoka to try? |
Haven't switched over to shadems yet. If you point me to the data (copy
before flagging) and a copy after flagging I can do it
…On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 8:42 PM Simon Perkins ***@***.***> wrote:
Feel free to post before and after plots of the VLA data here for
discussion
I'm not sure if this is possible! #77
<#77> is caused by is caused by
two wrongs making a right for MeerKAT data, but failing on other multi-SPW
datasets.
Thankfully @IanHeywood <https://github.com/IanHeywood> was intrepid
enough to try it on something with interesting SPW's.
Not sure I follow. One of the datasets has all the original DDIDs but no
rows in the MS aside from one. The other has only one SPW and associated
rows. Either way it should now be able to flag multiple SPW. Could we plot
data without flags (add the flags in casa plotms, should display in red)
and with flags, just to be sure it does something logical here?
Ah I see. To reiterate: MeerKAT data only has a single SPW and the code
prior to this code only worked for a single SPW. @IanHeywood
<https://github.com/IanHeywood> tried it on an MS with multiple SPW's,
exposing the logic error.
Thus, I didn't think it would be possible to get "before the bug" plots.
However, I understand that you're asking for plots with and without
flagging for the VLA MS on this branch? Got a handy shadems command for
@smasoka <https://github.com/smasoka> to try?
—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#79 (comment)>, or
unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AB4RE6RQXNRXIE5OKDFD4ULS3W3SVANCNFSM4WSAZ2LQ>
.
--
--
Benjamin Hugo
PhD. student,
Centre for Radio Astronomy Techniques and Technologies
Department of Physics and Electronics
Rhodes University
Junior software developer
Radio Astronomy Research Group
South African Radio Astronomy Observatory
Black River Business Park
Observatory
Cape Town
|
I want to compare flags prior and post flagging with tricolour. Just a
glance to see if it is catching the right stuff in all the SPWs. I will
colour them by SPW
…On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 8:53 PM Benna Hugo ***@***.***> wrote:
Haven't switched over to shadems yet. If you point me to the data (copy
before flagging) and a copy after flagging I can do it
On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 8:42 PM Simon Perkins ***@***.***>
wrote:
> Feel free to post before and after plots of the VLA data here for
> discussion
>
> I'm not sure if this is possible! #77
> <#77> is caused by is caused
> by two wrongs making a right for MeerKAT data, but failing on other
> multi-SPW datasets.
>
> Thankfully @IanHeywood <https://github.com/IanHeywood> was intrepid
> enough to try it on something with interesting SPW's.
>
> Not sure I follow. One of the datasets has all the original DDIDs but no
> rows in the MS aside from one. The other has only one SPW and associated
> rows. Either way it should now be able to flag multiple SPW. Could we plot
> data without flags (add the flags in casa plotms, should display in red)
> and with flags, just to be sure it does something logical here?
>
> Ah I see. To reiterate: MeerKAT data only has a single SPW and the code
> prior to this code only worked for a single SPW. @IanHeywood
> <https://github.com/IanHeywood> tried it on an MS with multiple SPW's,
> exposing the logic error.
>
> Thus, I didn't think it would be possible to get "before the bug" plots.
> However, I understand that you're asking for plots with and without
> flagging for the VLA MS on this branch? Got a handy shadems command for
> @smasoka <https://github.com/smasoka> to try?
>
> —
> You are receiving this because you commented.
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
> <#79 (comment)>, or
> unsubscribe
> <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AB4RE6RQXNRXIE5OKDFD4ULS3W3SVANCNFSM4WSAZ2LQ>
> .
>
--
--
Benjamin Hugo
PhD. student,
Centre for Radio Astronomy Techniques and Technologies
Department of Physics and Electronics
Rhodes University
Junior software developer
Radio Astronomy Research Group
South African Radio Astronomy Observatory
Black River Business Park
Observatory
Cape Town
--
--
Benjamin Hugo
PhD. student,
Centre for Radio Astronomy Techniques and Technologies
Department of Physics and Electronics
Rhodes University
Junior software developer
Radio Astronomy Research Group
South African Radio Astronomy Observatory
Black River Business Park
Observatory
Cape Town
|
I guess there's also the question of whether our default MeerKAT channel masks apply to other instruments... I would guess not? |
Only satellite (maybe -- not all constellations may be visible). I would
remove the request to mask in the strategy.
…On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 9:07 PM Simon Perkins ***@***.***> wrote:
I guess there's also the question of whether our default MeerKAT channel
masks apply to other instruments...
I would guess not?
—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#79 (comment)>, or
unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AB4RE6VSBB5BOWSVEL475GLS3W6QBANCNFSM4WSAZ2LQ>
.
--
--
Benjamin Hugo
PhD. student,
Centre for Radio Astronomy Techniques and Technologies
Department of Physics and Electronics
Rhodes University
Junior software developer
Radio Astronomy Research Group
South African Radio Astronomy Observatory
Black River Business Park
Observatory
Cape Town
|
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
A followup on this. Where is the VLA dataset so that I can test whether this branch does the right thing in the case of multi-spw? |
I do have VLA archival data on my NAS that I can use to test, but it is not P-band as with @IanHeywood 's case. |
I'm going to deploy my spidery powers and merge this. I actually need the dask bug fix in order to do some urgent commissioning. I will get to looking at VLA data later - that is a lower priority item |
Thanks @smasoka |
Fixes the indexing discovered by #77