bump rustc-perf submodule

[lqd]

This updates the rustc-perf submodule to pull in the recent changes, in particular the error handling in rust-lang/rustc-perf#2021 fixing the error we saw in a recent run.

I think I did this correctly, submodules are so annoying.

r? kobzol

(opening as draft to do a perf run and check that nothing has changed indeed)

[rustbot]

⚠️ Warning ⚠️

• These commits modify submodules.

[lqd]

@bors try @rust-timer queue

[bors]

⌛ Trying commit 958a772 with merge 142e90b...

[bors]

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: 142e90b (142e90b6d5834da42baaf84631409b68ca8af4c2)

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (142e90b): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌ regressions - no action needed

Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR may lead to changes in compiler perf.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is the most reliable metric that we have; it was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment. However, even this metric can sometimes exhibit noise.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	1.1%	[1.1%, 1.1%]	1
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (secondary -2.3%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-2.3%	[-2.3%, -2.3%]	1
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 763.48s -> 763.509s (0.00%)
Artifact size: 325.77 MiB -> 325.74 MiB (-0.01%)

[Kobzol]

Looks good, including perf. You can r=me.

[lqd]

Great, thank you. Let's keep this as rollup=never for bisections or CI failures in opt-dist.

@bors r=kobzol

[bors]

📌 Commit 958a772 has been approved by kobzol

It is now in the queue for this repository.

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit 958a772 with merge fb65a3e...

[bors]

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: kobzol
Pushing fb65a3e to master...

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (fb65a3e): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary 2.6%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	2.6%	[1.1%, 4.1%]	2
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	2.6%	[1.1%, 4.1%]	2

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 762.986s -> 763.38s (0.05%)
Artifact size: 326.03 MiB -> 326.03 MiB (-0.00%)