Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

EVPN_VXLAN_HLD: update to allow recording for p2mp remote vteps #1897

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

bradh352
Copy link

Complimentary ticket to sonic-net/sonic-swss#3480 in order to allow p2mp vteps to be tracked. This will mostly aid in debugging. The HLD specifically states this when talking about P2P vs P2MP:

"For an external user, there will be no changes from usability perspective since the schema is unchanged."

However this is not entirely true since the state table wasn't recording p2mp remote vteps and therefore show vxlan remotevtep would return no results making a user believe the vxlan tunnel was not properly established. This as well as the aforementioned PR corrects this oversight.

Signed-off-by: Brad House (@bradh352)

Complimentary ticket to sonic-net/sonic-swss#3480
in order to allow p2mp vteps to be tracked.  This will mostly aid
in debugging.  The HLD specifically states this when talking about P2P vs
P2MP:

"For an external user, there will be no changes from usability perspective
since the schema is unchanged."

However this is not entirely true since the state table wasn't recording
p2mp remote vteps and therefore `show vxlan remotevtep` would return no
results making a user believe the vxlan tunnel was not properly
established.  This as well as the aforementioned PR corrects this
oversight.

Signed-off-by: Brad House (@bradh352)
@mssonicbld
Copy link
Collaborator

/azp run

Copy link

No pipelines are associated with this pull request.

@mssonicbld
Copy link
Collaborator

/azp run

Copy link

No pipelines are associated with this pull request.

@mssonicbld
Copy link
Collaborator

/azp run

Copy link

No pipelines are associated with this pull request.

@bradh352
Copy link
Author

@dgsudharsan mind reviewing this change? You seem to have been the one to contribute the P2MP vs P2P information.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants