Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Skip script dualtor_io/test_tor_bgp_failure.py temporarily in PR test. #16449

Merged

Conversation

yutongzhang-microsoft
Copy link
Contributor

Description of PR

The script dualtor_io/test_tor_bgp_failure.py has recently been failing frequently on the KVM testbed. This issue is being tracked in #16448. As a temporary measure, we have applied a conditional mark to skip this test in PR checks.

Summary:
Fixes # (issue)

Type of change

  • Bug fix
  • Testbed and Framework(new/improvement)
  • New Test case
    • Skipped for non-supported platforms
    • Add ownership here(Microsft required only)
  • Test case improvement

Back port request

  • 202012
  • 202205
  • 202305
  • 202311
  • 202405
  • 202411

Approach

What is the motivation for this PR?

The script dualtor_io/test_tor_bgp_failure.py has recently been failing frequently on the KVM testbed. This issue is being tracked in #16448. As a temporary measure, we have applied a conditional mark to skip this test in PR checks.

How did you do it?

As a temporary measure, we have applied a conditional mark to skip this test in PR checks.

How did you verify/test it?

Any platform specific information?

Supported testbed topology if it's a new test case?

Documentation

@mssonicbld
Copy link
Collaborator

/azp run

Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@wangxin wangxin merged commit 6feb630 into sonic-net:master Jan 13, 2025
19 checks passed
@yutongzhang-microsoft yutongzhang-microsoft deleted the yutongzhang/skip_dualtor_io branch January 13, 2025 01:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants