Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Mohammed-Alanazisa/sourceryCreate devcontainer.json #447

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Mohammed-Alanazisa
Copy link

@Mohammed-Alanazisa Mohammed-Alanazisa commented Dec 6, 2024

Summary by Sourcery

Build:

  • Add a devcontainer.json file to configure the development container environment.

Copy link

sourcery-ai bot commented Dec 6, 2024

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

The PR adds a basic development container configuration using the Microsoft universal dev container image. The implementation is straightforward, creating a minimal devcontainer.json file with default settings.

[FILTERED - Invalid mermaid diagram] Architecture diagram for the new devcontainer.json setup

graph TD;
    A[Developer's Machine] -->|Uses| B[Dev Container]
    B -->|Based on| C[Universal Dev Container Image]
    C -->|Hosted on| D[Microsoft Container Registry]
Loading

File-Level Changes

Change Details Files
Configure development container environment
  • Set up Microsoft's universal dev container image version 2 as the base image
  • Initialize an empty features configuration block for future extensibility
.devcontainer/devcontainer.json

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

  • Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
  • Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
  • Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
    issue from a review comment by replying to it.
  • Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
    request title to generate a title at any time.
  • Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
    the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time. You can also use
    this command to specify where the summary should be inserted.

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

  • Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
    summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
  • Change the review language.
  • Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
  • Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

@Mohammed-Alanazisa Mohammed-Alanazisa marked this pull request as draft December 6, 2024 03:37
@Mohammed-Alanazisa Mohammed-Alanazisa marked this pull request as ready for review December 6, 2024 03:38
Copy link

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey @Mohammed-Alanazisa - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:

Overall Comments:

  • Consider using a more specific base image instead of the universal image if you have defined development requirements. This could reduce container size and startup time.
  • The empty 'features' block can be removed if not being used, or specify the features you need for development.
Here's what I looked at during the review
  • 🟢 Functionality: all looks good
  • 🟡 General issues: 1 issue found
  • 🟢 Security: all looks good
  • 🟢 Review instructions: all looks good
  • 🟢 Testing: all looks good
  • 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
  • 🟢 Documentation: all looks good

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨

LangSmith trace

Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.

.devcontainer/devcontainer.json Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey @Mohammed-Alanazisa - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:

Overall Comments:

  • Consider either removing the empty 'features' object or specifying the development features you need for this project.
Here's what I looked at during the review
  • 🟢 Functionality: all looks good
  • 🟡 General issues: 1 issue found
  • 🟢 Security: all looks good
  • 🟢 Review instructions: all looks good
  • 🟢 Testing: all looks good
  • 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
  • 🟢 Documentation: all looks good

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨

LangSmith trace

Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.

@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
{
"image": "mcr.microsoft.com/devcontainers/universal:2",
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

suggestion (performance): [FILTERED by comment_validation]
Consider using a more specific base image and defining required features explicitly

The universal image includes many tools you might not need, which can lead to larger container sizes and slower builds. Consider using a more specific base image (like python, node, or java) and explicitly defining required features in the features object for better performance and maintainability.

Importance: medium

  "image": "mcr.microsoft.com/devcontainers/python:1",
  "features": {
    "ghcr.io/devcontainers/features/node:1": {},
    "ghcr.io/devcontainers/features/git:1": {}
  }

Importance: medium

@Mohammed-Alanazisa Mohammed-Alanazisa marked this pull request as draft December 6, 2024 03:38
@Mohammed-Alanazisa Mohammed-Alanazisa marked this pull request as ready for review December 6, 2024 05:43
Copy link

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We have skipped reviewing this pull request. It looks like we've already reviewed the commit 8d9cdea in this pull request.

@Mohammed-Alanazisa
Copy link
Author

We have skipped reviewing this pull request. It looks like we've already reviewed the commit 8d9cdea in this pull request.

Co-authored-by: sourcery-ai[bot] <58596630+sourcery-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant