-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Dev/nir #104
Dev/nir #104
Conversation
There is a lot of infrastructure in |
Codecov ReportAttention:
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #104 +/- ##
===========================================
- Coverage 90.03% 88.59% -1.45%
===========================================
Files 31 32 +1
Lines 1244 1341 +97
===========================================
+ Hits 1120 1188 +68
- Misses 124 153 +29 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
@sheiksadique the implementation now uses nirtorch.load |
The current tests are not passing because the latest nirtorch version 0.2.0 has not been published, see neuromorphs/NIRTorch#6 |
Use coverage from insightsengineering where threshold can be defined
Code Coverage Summary
Results for commit: 8fc9fd0 Minimum allowed coverage is ♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results |
Use a newest version of codecoverage
Try use target variable for coverage
It looks like this might be necessary for using of threshold variables on codecov.
Remove status and other tags from this file
Fix threshold in 60% for coverage of patches and project
No description provided.