This repository has been archived by the owner on Jan 3, 2025. It is now read-only.
Raise errors on failed API calls #654
Open
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
I think httparty provides something like response.ok? To see if it is a 2xx or 3xx code |
|
You can check the docs |
|
@thewca-bot deploy staging |
gregorbg
suggested changes
Aug 28, 2024
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Currently we haven't been checking for status code or raising errors when we don't get a 200 back from the monolith. This is a basic/non-comprehensive implementation of status codes for API endpoints that we call.
One thing I was wondering: If we get a 302/304 response, would that trigger a false-positive error message? Or is the server smart enough to still make it look like a 200?