Reformat #1112
Reformat #1112
Conversation
|
Looking into it, this is formatted with ormolu, which has clear goals stated here: It seems to be purposefully non-configurable to create some kind of standard way of formatting. Previously I've used stylish: Without doing a close comparison, is seems to be more "light touch". There is also fourmolu, which is a fork of ormolu that is more configurable. It's called fourmolu from its (default?) four-character indent. These are all actively maintained, and fourmolu merges upstream changes from ormolu. I have no strong feelings on code formatting rules, so would be happy to go with a opinionated option like ormolu as I don't have strong opinions of my own. :) What do others think? I think we should try to merge as many PRs as possible before applying the formatting to all files. |
| v) | ||
| $ cycleArcsInArc a | ||
|
|
||
| -- | In each of @a <*> b@, @a <* b@ and @a *> b@ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
ormolu seems to have deleted this documentation completely??
My editor reformatted these files on the patterned-tactus branch without me realising. I could try to untangle my changes and undo the reformat, but thought I'd reformat them separately on this PR, and then merge back into patterned-tactus, to hopefully end up with a clean PR for that.