*: move tso to pkg

[rleungx]

Signed-off-by: Ryan Leung [email protected]

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: Ref #5836.

What is changed and how does it work?

Check List

Tests

• Unit test

Release note

None

[ti-chi-bot]

[REVIEW NOTIFICATION]

This pull request has been approved by:

• JmPotato
• lhy1024

To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling /cc @reviewer in the comment.
After your PR has acquired the required number of LGTMs, you can assign this pull request to the committer in the list by filling /assign @committer in the comment to help you merge this pull request.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review.
Reviewer can cancel approval by submitting a request changes review.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Base: 75.76% // Head: 75.77% // Increases project coverage by +0.00% 🎉

Coverage data is based on head (c5203c4) compared to base (7fb70d1).
Patch has no changes to coverable lines.

❗ Current head c5203c4 differs from pull request most recent head 72226b0. Consider uploading reports for the commit 72226b0 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #5901   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   75.76%   75.77%           
=======================================
  Files         343      343           
  Lines       35022    34993   -29     
=======================================
- Hits        26534    26515   -19     
+ Misses       6226     6220    -6     
+ Partials     2262     2258    -4     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	75.77% <ø> (+<0.01%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
pkg/tso/allocator_manager.go	65.32% <ø> (ø)
pkg/tso/filter.go	75.00% <ø> (ø)
pkg/tso/global_allocator.go	61.25% <ø> (ø)
pkg/tso/local_allocator.go	78.37% <ø> (ø)
pkg/tso/metrics.go	100.00% <ø> (ø)
pkg/tso/tso.go	71.34% <ø> (ø)
server/grpc_service.go	49.42% <ø> (+0.07%)	⬆️
server/handler.go	52.88% <ø> (-0.39%)	⬇️
server/server.go	74.74% <ø> (-0.51%)	⬇️
tests/cluster.go	79.20% <ø> (ø)
... and 30 more

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

[JmPotato]

/merge

[ti-chi-bot]

@JmPotato: It seems you want to merge this PR, I will help you trigger all the tests:

/run-all-tests

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository.

[ti-chi-bot]

This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge.

Commit hash: c5203c4

[ti-chi-bot]

@rleungx: Your PR was out of date, I have automatically updated it for you.

If the CI test fails, you just re-trigger the test that failed and the bot will merge the PR for you after the CI passes.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository.

[binshi-bing]

LGTM

[ti-chi-bot]

@binshi-bing: Thanks for your review. The bot only counts approvals from reviewers and higher roles in list, but you're still welcome to leave your comments.

In response to this:

LGTM

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository.

[binshi-bing]

shall we move server/tso/* to pkg/mcs/tso/? just confirm. Moving to pkg/tso makes sense to me too, as it is the library shared by tso in all-in-one pd and tso microservice, and we put tso microservice specific code in pkg/mc/tso.
@rleungx @JmPotato

[rleungx]

shall we move server/tso/* to pkg/mcs/tso/? just confirm. Moving to pkg/tso makes sense to me too, as it is the library shared by tso in all-in-one pd and tso microservice, and we put tso microservice specific code in pkg/mc/tso. @rleungx @JmPotato

IMO, the tso microservice related code should be put into pkg/mcs/tso, the common logic should be put into /pkg.