Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

COG 870 Remove duplicate edges from the code graph #293

Merged
merged 13 commits into from
Dec 17, 2024

Conversation

lxobr
Copy link
Collaborator

@lxobr lxobr commented Dec 10, 2024

  • Refactored the summarize_code task into a generator that does not call the add_points function.

  • summarize_code now:

    • Yields input data points.
    • Creates and yields summary data points.

    This ensures all data points reach the add_datapoints function.

  • Moved the add_datapoints task to the end of the pipeline.

  • Extracted run_code_graph_pipeline into a standalone function.

  • Added a script example for running the code graph pipeline with the new function.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a new Python script for executing a code graph pipeline.
    • Added a new function to handle the code graph processing pipeline.
  • Improvements

    • Updated method signatures for clarity and consistency.
    • Enhanced error handling and streamlined function calls for better performance.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Adjusted formatting and logic within existing functions to improve functionality.
  • Deprecation Notices

    • Marked existing functions as deprecated in favor of new implementations.
  • Documentation

    • Updated comments and structure for better readability and understanding.

@lxobr lxobr self-assigned this Dec 10, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 10, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces significant modifications across four files, primarily focusing on the summarize_code function in cognee/tasks/summarization/summarize_code.py. The parameter name has been updated to reflect a new expected input type, and the function now yields results instead of returning a list. Additionally, evals/eval_swe_bench.py has undergone restructuring, with the introduction of a new function to manage code graph processing tasks. A new script in examples/python/code_graph_example.py has also been added to facilitate the execution of the code graph pipeline. Furthermore, cognee/api/v1/cognify/code_graph_pipeline.py has been updated to include the new run_code_graph_pipeline function.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
cognee/tasks/summarization/summarize_code.py Renamed parameter code_files to code_graph_nodes, updated logic to return None for empty input, and changed summary construction to yield results instead of returning a list.
evals/eval_swe_bench.py Replaced generate_patch_with_cognee with run_code_graph_pipeline, redefined function calls, streamlined error handling, and modified main function for better package management.
examples/python/code_graph_example.py Added a new script that defines an asynchronous main function to execute the code graph pipeline and handle command-line arguments.
cognee/api/v1/cognify/code_graph_pipeline.py Introduced run_code_graph_pipeline function to manage code graph processing, including data setup and task execution.

Possibly related PRs

  • Add code_graph_demo notebook #191: The cognee_code_graph_demo.ipynb notebook introduces functionality for generating knowledge graphs from code, which aligns with the changes in the summarize_code function that also processes code files and generates summaries.
  • Feat/cog-544 eval on swe bench #232: This PR implements functionality for evaluating the cognee code graph pipeline, which involves processing datasets and could relate to the changes made in the summarize_code function regarding how code files are summarized and processed.
  • Feature/cog 539 implementing additional retriever approaches #262: The addition of the CodeSummary class in cognee/tasks/summarization/models.py is directly related to the changes in the summarize_code function, which now yields CodeSummary objects based on the new mapping of summaries.

Suggested labels

run-checks

Suggested reviewers

  • hajdul88
  • Vasilije1990
  • alekszievr

🐰 In the code where the graphs grow,
A new path for summaries flows.
With nodes that yield, not just return,
The rabbit hops, and lessons learn.
From files to graphs, a tale unfolds,
In every line, a story told! 🌟

Tip

CodeRabbit's docstrings feature is now available as part of our Early Access Program! Simply use the command @coderabbitai generate docstrings to have CodeRabbit automatically generate docstrings for your pull request.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
evals/eval_swe_bench.py (2)

Line range hint 44-49: Consider moving imports inside the function to the top-level scope

The imports within the run_code_graph_pipeline function can be moved to the top of the module unless there is a specific reason to keep them inside the function (e.g., to avoid circular dependencies). This improves readability and follows Python's best practices.

Proposed code change:

-async def run_code_graph_pipeline(repo_path):
-    import os
-    import pathlib
-    import cognee
-    from cognee.infrastructure.databases.relational import create_db_and_tables
+import os
+import pathlib
+import cognee
+from cognee.infrastructure.databases.relational import create_db_and_tables

+async def run_code_graph_pipeline(repo_path):

71-71: Remove unused parameter search_type

The parameter search_type in the function generate_patch_with_cognee is not used in the function body. Consider removing it to clean up the function signature.

Proposed code change:

-async def generate_patch_with_cognee(instance, llm_client, search_type=SearchType.CHUNKS):
+async def generate_patch_with_cognee(instance, llm_client):
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6d85165 and 15cf708.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • cognee/tasks/summarization/summarize_code.py (1 hunks)
  • evals/eval_swe_bench.py (3 hunks)
  • examples/python/code_graph_example.py (1 hunks)

cognee/tasks/summarization/summarize_code.py Show resolved Hide resolved
cognee/tasks/summarization/summarize_code.py Show resolved Hide resolved
examples/python/code_graph_example.py Show resolved Hide resolved
@borisarzentar borisarzentar changed the base branch from main to dev December 11, 2024 20:54
evals/eval_swe_bench.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

♻️ Duplicate comments (2)
cognee/tasks/summarization/summarize_code.py (2)

14-14: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Update return type annotation to reflect generator

The function summarize_code now yields DataPoint objects instead of returning a list. Update the return type annotation to -> AsyncGenerator[DataPoint, None] to accurately represent its behavior.

Apply this diff:

- ) -> list[DataPoint]:
+ ) -> AsyncGenerator[DataPoint, None]:

3-3: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Import AsyncGenerator from typing

Since summarize_code is now an async generator, import AsyncGenerator from the typing module to properly annotate the return type.

Apply this diff:

- from typing import Type
+ from typing import Type, AsyncGenerator
🧹 Nitpick comments (6)
cognee/api/v1/cognify/code_graph_pipeline.py (5)

113-116: Consider moving imports to the module level

The imports inside the run_code_graph_pipeline function (lines 113-116) can be moved to the top of the file. This enhances readability and adheres to standard Python conventions.

Apply this diff to move the imports:

+ import os
+ import pathlib
+ import cognee
+ from cognee.infrastructure.databases.relational import create_db_and_tables

 async def run_code_graph_pipeline(repo_path):
-     import os
-     import pathlib
-     import cognee
-     from cognee.infrastructure.databases.relational import create_db_and_tables

114-114: Remove redundant import of pathlib

The module pathlib is already imported at the module level on line 3 (from pathlib import Path). The import on line 114 is redundant and can be removed.

Apply this diff to remove the redundant import:

-     import pathlib

116-116: Move create_db_and_tables import to the module level

For consistency and clarity, consider moving the import of create_db_and_tables to the module level with other imports.

Apply this diff:

+ from cognee.infrastructure.databases.relational import create_db_and_tables

 async def run_code_graph_pipeline(repo_path):
-     from cognee.infrastructure.databases.relational import create_db_and_tables

119-122: Simplify path manipulations using Path objects

Currently, both os.path.join and pathlib.Path are used for path manipulations. For better readability and consistency, consider using Path objects throughout.

Apply this diff to refactor the path handling:

-     data_directory_path = str(pathlib.Path(os.path.join(file_path, ".data_storage/code_graph")).resolve())
-     cognee_directory_path = str(pathlib.Path(os.path.join(file_path, ".cognee_system/code_graph")).resolve())
+     data_directory_path = (file_path / ".data_storage" / "code_graph").resolve()
+     cognee_directory_path = (file_path / ".cognee_system" / "code_graph").resolve()

112-136: Add a docstring to run_code_graph_pipeline

Adding a docstring to the run_code_graph_pipeline function will improve code readability and maintainability by explaining the purpose and usage of the function.

cognee/tasks/summarization/summarize_code.py (1)

18-18: Ensure generator function concludes appropriately

The return statement at line 18 exits the generator function without yielding any values if code_graph_nodes is empty. This is acceptable, but for clarity, consider using return None to explicitly indicate the end of the generator.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 15cf708 and 4023b4d.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • cognee/api/v1/cognify/code_graph_pipeline.py (3 hunks)
  • cognee/tasks/summarization/summarize_code.py (1 hunks)
  • evals/eval_swe_bench.py (2 hunks)
  • examples/python/code_graph_example.py (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • examples/python/code_graph_example.py
🔇 Additional comments (2)
evals/eval_swe_bench.py (2)

10-10: Refactored run_code_graph_pipeline import improves modularity

Good job moving run_code_graph_pipeline to code_graph_pipeline.py and importing it here. This enhances code organization and reusability.


39-44: Function generate_patch_with_cognee correctly utilizes the pipeline

The updated function properly calls run_code_graph_pipeline and processes the results asynchronously, which aligns with best practices for async operations.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
cognee/api/v1/cognify/code_graph_pipeline.py (3)

1-4: Enhance deprecation notice with timeline

The deprecation notice is clear but could be more helpful by including:

  • When these functions will be removed
  • Migration guide or link to documentation
 # NOTICE: This module contains deprecated functions.
 # Use only the run_code_graph_pipeline function; all other functions are deprecated.
+# These functions will be removed in version X.Y.Z. See migration guide at <link>
 # Related issue: COG-906

133-139: Make task configurations configurable

The task configurations use hardcoded batch sizes which might not be optimal for all scenarios.

Consider making these configurable:

+    def get_batch_size(task_name: str) -> int:
+        return cognee.config.get(f"tasks.{task_name}.batch_size", default=50)
+
     tasks = [
         Task(get_repo_file_dependencies),
-        Task(enrich_dependency_graph, task_config={"batch_size": 50}),
-        Task(expand_dependency_graph, task_config={"batch_size": 50}),
-        Task(summarize_code, summarization_model=SummarizedContent, task_config={"batch_size": 50}),
-        Task(add_data_points, task_config={"batch_size": 50}),
+        Task(enrich_dependency_graph, task_config={"batch_size": get_batch_size("enrich_dependency_graph")}),
+        Task(expand_dependency_graph, task_config={"batch_size": get_batch_size("expand_dependency_graph")}),
+        Task(summarize_code, summarization_model=SummarizedContent, task_config={"batch_size": get_batch_size("summarize_code")}),
+        Task(add_data_points, task_config={"batch_size": get_batch_size("add_data_points")}),
     ]

124-127: Consider using temporary directories for isolation

Using fixed directory names under the package directory could cause conflicts between different runs or in different environments.

Consider using tempfile.mkdtemp() to create isolated directories for each run, or make the paths configurable through environment variables.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4023b4d and ad1b435.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • cognee/api/v1/cognify/code_graph_pipeline.py (4 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
cognee/api/v1/cognify/code_graph_pipeline.py (1)

62-62: Verify error handling migration

While the deprecation notice is good, ensure that the error handling and telemetry capabilities from run_pipeline are properly migrated to run_code_graph_pipeline.

✅ Verification successful

Error handling and telemetry are properly migrated

The new run_code_graph_pipeline implementation includes comprehensive error handling and telemetry:

  • Sends telemetry events at pipeline start, completion, and error states
  • Wraps core execution in try-except block
  • Updates pipeline status appropriately for both success and error cases
  • Maintains consistent error reporting pattern with the deprecated version
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for error handling and telemetry in the new implementation
rg -A 5 "try|except|send_telemetry" cognee/api/v1/cognify/code_graph_pipeline.py

Length of output: 1600

cognee/api/v1/cognify/code_graph_pipeline.py Show resolved Hide resolved
cognee/api/v1/cognify/code_graph_pipeline.py Show resolved Hide resolved
@lxobr lxobr merged commit da5e3ab into dev Dec 17, 2024
23 of 24 checks passed
@lxobr lxobr deleted the COG-870-deduplicate-code-graph-edges branch December 17, 2024 11:02
borisarzentar added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 10, 2025
* feat: Add error handling in case user is already part of database and permission already given to group

Added error handling in case permission is already given to group and user is already part of group

Feature COG-656

* feat: Add user verification for accessing data

Verify user has access to data before returning it

Feature COG-656

* feat: Add compute search to cognee

Add compute search to cognee which makes searches human readable

Feature COG-656

* feat: Add simple instruction for system prompt

Add simple instruction for system prompt

Feature COG-656

* pass pydantic model tocognify

* feat: Add unauth access error to getting data

Raise unauth access error when trying to read data without access

Feature COG-656

* refactor: Rename query compute to query completion

Rename searching type from compute to completion

Refactor COG-656

* chore: Update typo in code

Update typo in string in code

Chore COG-656

* Add mcp to cognee

* Add simple README

* Update cognee-mcp/mcpcognee/__main__.py

Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* Create dockerhub.yml

* Update get_cognify_router.py

* fix: Resolve reflection issue when running cognee a second time after pruning data

When running cognee a second time after pruning data some metadata doesn't get pruned.
This makes cognee believe some tables exist that have been deleted

Fix

* fix: Add metadata reflection fix to sqlite as well

Added fix when reflecting metadata to sqlite as well

Fix

* update

* Revert "fix: Add metadata reflection fix to sqlite as well"

This reverts commit 394a0b2.

* COG-810 Implement a top-down dependency graph builder tool (#268)

* feat: parse repo to call graph

* Update/repo_processor/top_down_repo_parse.py task

* fix: minor improvements

* feat: file parsing jedi script optimisation

---------

* Add type to DataPoint metadata (#364)

* Add type to DataPoint metadata

* Add missing index_fields

* Use DataPoint UUID type in pgvector create_data_points

* Make _metadata mandatory everywhere

* Fixes

* Fixes to our demo

* feat: Add search by dataset for cognee

Added ability to search by datasets for cognee users

Feature COG-912

* feat: outsources chunking parameters to extract chunk from documents … (#289)

* feat: outsources chunking parameters to extract chunk from documents task

* fix: Remove backend lock from UI

Removed lock that prevented using multiple datasets in cognify

Fix COG-912

* COG 870 Remove duplicate edges from the code graph (#293)

* feat: turn summarize_code into generator

* feat: extract run_code_graph_pipeline, update the pipeline

* feat: minimal code graph example

* refactor: update argument

* refactor: move run_code_graph_pipeline to cognify/code_graph_pipeline

* refactor: indentation and whitespace nits

* refactor: add deprecated use comments and warnings

---------

Co-authored-by: Vasilije <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Igor Ilic <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Boris <[email protected]>

* test: Added test for getting of documents for search

Added test to verify getting documents related to datasets intended for search

Test COG-912

* Structured code summarization (#375)

* feat: turn summarize_code into generator

* feat: extract run_code_graph_pipeline, update the pipeline

* feat: minimal code graph example

* refactor: update argument

* refactor: move run_code_graph_pipeline to cognify/code_graph_pipeline

* refactor: indentation and whitespace nits

* refactor: add deprecated use comments and warnings

* Structured code summarization

* add missing prompt file

* Remove summarization_model argument from summarize_code and fix typehinting

* minor refactors

---------

Co-authored-by: lxobr <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Vasilije <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Igor Ilic <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Boris <[email protected]>

* fix: Resolve issue with cognify router graph model default value

Resolve issue with default value for graph model in cognify endpoint

Fix

* chore: Resolve typo in getting documents code

Resolve typo in code

chore COG-912

* Update .github/workflows/dockerhub.yml

Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* Update .github/workflows/dockerhub.yml

* Update .github/workflows/dockerhub.yml

* Update .github/workflows/dockerhub.yml

* Update get_cognify_router.py

* fix: Resolve syntax issue with cognify router

Resolve syntax issue with cognify router

Fix

* feat: Add ruff pre-commit hook for linting and formatting

Added formatting and linting on pre-commit hook

Feature COG-650

* chore: Update ruff lint options in pyproject file

Update ruff lint options in pyproject file

Chore

* test: Add ruff linter github action

Added linting check with ruff in github actions

Test COG-650

* feat: deletes executor limit from get_repo_file_dependencies

* feat: implements mock feature in LiteLLM engine

* refactor: Remove changes to cognify router

Remove changes to cognify router

Refactor COG-650

* fix: fixing boolean env for github actions

* test: Add test for ruff format for cognee code

Test if code is formatted for cognee

Test COG-650

* refactor: Rename ruff gh actions

Rename ruff gh actions to be more understandable

Refactor COG-650

* chore: Remove checking of ruff lint and format on push

Remove checking of ruff lint and format on push

Chore COG-650

* feat: Add deletion of local files when deleting data

Delete local files when deleting data from cognee

Feature COG-475

* fix: changes back the max workers to 12

* feat: Adds mock summary for codegraph pipeline

* refacotr: Add current development status

Save current development status

Refactor

* Fix langfuse

* Fix langfuse

* Fix langfuse

* Add evaluation notebook

* Rename eval notebook

* chore: Add temporary state of development

Add temp development state to branch

Chore

* fix: Add poetry.lock file, make langfuse mandatory

Added langfuse as mandatory dependency, added poetry.lock file

Fix

* Fix: fixes langfuse config settings

* feat: Add deletion of local files made by cognee through data endpoint

Delete local files made by cognee when deleting data from database through endpoint

Feature COG-475

* test: Revert changes on test_pgvector

Revert changes on test_pgvector which were made to test deletion of local files

Test COG-475

* chore: deletes the old test for the codegraph pipeline

* test: Add test to verify deletion of local files

Added test that checks local files created by cognee will be deleted and those not created by cognee won't

Test COG-475

* chore: deletes unused old version of the codegraph

* chore: deletes unused imports from code_graph_pipeline

* Ingest non-code files

* Fixing review findings

* Ingest non-code files (#395)

* Ingest non-code files

* Fixing review findings

* test: Update test regarding message

Update assertion message, add veryfing of file existence

* Handle retryerrors in code summary (#396)

* Handle retryerrors in code summary

* Log instead of print

* fix: updates the acreate_structured_output

* chore: Add logging to sentry when file which should exist can't be found

Log to sentry that a file which should exist can't be found

Chore COG-475

* Fix diagram

* fix: refactor mcp

* Add Smithery CLI installation instructions and badge

* Move readme

* Update README.md

* Update README.md

* Cog 813 source code chunks (#383)

* fix: pass the list of all CodeFiles to enrichment task

* feat: introduce SourceCodeChunk, update metadata

* feat: get_source_code_chunks code graph pipeline task

* feat: integrate get_source_code_chunks task, comment out summarize_code

* Fix code summarization (#387)

* feat: update data models

* feat: naive parse long strings in source code

* fix: get_non_py_files instead of get_non_code_files

* fix: limit recursion, add comment

* handle embedding empty input error (#398)

* feat: robustly handle CodeFile source code

* refactor: sort imports

* todo: add support for other embedding models

* feat: add custom logger

* feat: add robustness to get_source_code_chunks

Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* feat: improve embedding exceptions

* refactor: format indents, rename module

---------

Co-authored-by: alekszievr <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* Fix diagram

* Fix instructions

* adding and fixing files

* Update README.md

* ruff format

* Fix linter issues

* Implement PR review

* Comment out profiling

* fix: add allowed extensions

* fix: adhere UnstructuredDocument.read() to Document

* feat: time code graph run and add mock support

* Fix ollama, work on visualization

* fix: Fixes faulty logging format and sets up error logging in dynamic steps example

* Overcome ContextWindowExceededError by checking token count while chunking (#413)

* fix: Fixes duplicated edges in cognify by limiting the recursion depth in add datapoints

* Adjust AudioDocument and handle None token limit

* Handle azure models as well

* Add clean logging to code graph example

* Remove setting envvars from arg

* fix: fixes create_cognee_style_network_with_logo unit test

* fix: removes accidental remained print

* Get embedding engine instead of passing it. Get it from vector engine instead of direct getter.

* Fix visualization

* Get embedding engine instead of passing it in code chunking.

* Fix poetry issues

* chore: Update version of poetry install action

* chore: Update action to trigger on pull request for any branch

* chore: Remove if in github action to allow triggering on push

* chore: Remove if condition to allow gh actions to trigger on push to PR

* chore: Update poetry version in github actions

* chore: Set fixed ubuntu version to 22.04

* chore: Update py lint to use ubuntu 22.04

* chore: update ubuntu version to 22.04

* feat: implements the first version of graph based completion in search

* chore: Update python 3.9 gh action to use 3.12 instead

* chore: Update formatting of utils.py

* Fix poetry issues

* Adjust integration tests

* fix: Fixes ruff formatting

* Handle circular import

* fix: Resolve profiler issue with partial and recursive logger imports

Resolve issue for profiler with partial and recursive logger imports

* fix: Remove logger from __init__.py file

* test: Test profiling on HEAD branch

* test: Return profiler to base branch

* Set max_tokens in config

* Adjust SWE-bench script to code graph pipeline call

* Adjust SWE-bench script to code graph pipeline call

* fix: Add fix for accessing dictionary elements that don't exits

Using get for the text key instead of direct access to handle situation if the text key doesn't exist

* feat: Add ability to change graph database configuration through cognee

* feat: adds pydantic types to graph layer models

* feat: adds basic retriever for swe bench

* Match Ruff version in config to the one in github actions

* feat: implements code retreiver

* Fix: fixes unit test for codepart search

* Format with Ruff 0.9.0

* Fix: deleting incorrect repo path

* fix: resolve issue with langfuse dependency installation when integrating cognee in different packages

* version: Increase version to 0.1.21

---------

Co-authored-by: Igor Ilic <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Vasilije <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Igor Ilic <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Rita Aleksziev <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: vasilije <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: lxobr <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: alekszievr <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: hajdul88 <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Henry Mao <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants